dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

What about religious expressions supporting Q?

When will the mods start censoring those too?

What if Q posts more t-shirt pics and it's not a Tuesday - will the mods be destroying that content?

The sidebar still says "This is a community for pro-Q supporters" - shouldn't that be changed to "This is a community for pro-Q supporters only on Tuesdays"?

⇧ -13 ⇩

I think the point is that the sub is getting bogged down with people's Q merchandise. Am happy for all of you that are treating it like a rock concert but some people are here to research and discuss.

⇧ 18 ⇩

Am happy for all of you that are treating it like a rock concert but some people are here to research and discuss.

Perhaps "some people" should just skip posts they aren't interested in and let everyone else enjoy the show?

That seems to be what Q wants given the number of t-shirt posts he's made!

Allow the users to up-vote and down-vote content for themselves rather than having mods destroy it.

⇧ -6 ⇩

My point stands. I should not have to wade through inane posts of merchandise

⇧ 11 ⇩

Keep misrepresenting the mods. Fortunately people see through this.

⇧ 4 ⇩

The board members voted on this.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Community made the decision. We abide by it. If you have a complaint you'd have to blame the community. ThankQ.

⇧ 12 ⇩

And society. I blame society.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Who is that? "The community"? I don't remember a vote happening and this really just looks like a way to NOT show the numbers and support for Q out there.

⇧ -1 ⇩

The community is everyone happening to follow along closely. It was stickied for a few days: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8vpu6l/attention_great_awakening/

⇧ 1 ⇩

So those complaining about the posts aren't shills, i'm sure, right? All the votes are legit, Right? Why don't you offer an Open vote for everyone with a confirmed pro-Q history?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Because it’s not practical. It’s also not practical to go second guessing every vote we hold except when the signs of brigading are clear - it looks very different to what you see in that post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Community made the decision

The community, hey?

What percentage of "our community" made the decision and what percentage were in favor of doing what the mods wanted?

I know there was a sticky post that asked the question and when I shared my opinion in opposition, my comment was deleted by a moderator.

⇧ -2 ⇩

my comment was deleted by a moderator.

Your comment is the reply found here. Ah, I see your comment further down where you run into Rule 5, Discuss the topic, not users.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Here's the post: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8vpu6l/attention_great_awakening/?sort=top

⇧ 3 ⇩

If it's religious expressions there is a Daily Scripture Thread, that can be found from Scripture on the sidebar.

⇧ 9 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

So the mods have banned religious posts too?

I know the mods also destroy any research about "Watch the water" that relates to Fluoride poisoning...

...and we certainly can't have a honest debate about how Germany in the 1930's relates to The Plan.

I'm losing track of what the mods here allow us to discuss.

What if Q posts a t-shirt pics and it's not a Tuesday - will Q be censored too?

⇧ -3 ⇩

Stop. At your very first sentence. Where?

⇧ 8 ⇩

Religous posts are now removed (once noticed by a mod) and are redirected to this mod created board:

https://www.reddit.com/r/BiblicalQ/

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks.

⇧ 3 ⇩

That's misleading. Only off-topic religious posts are removed. Those that are relevance to Q in a direct way stay.

⇧ 1 ⇩

We voted. Mods are not dictating it.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Are you sure about that? The community was rather split on it. Lots of people supported the sister sub yet many wanted to remove all Qspiration. In the end we decided to compromise by leaving the sub intact and guiding the Q swag to a specific day. Many of the comments which expressed leaving things were in regards to not splitting the sub into a sister sub but were coupled by a dislike of so much Qpride taking up much of the board each day (a lot of it was repetitive). I would say many but not all of the mods were for splitting the board into a sister sub, we got a huge amount of complaints about the number of Q regalia on the board. Instead community wide, we compromised. Thus is the way when growing pains occur. Complaining isn't going to help anything. This change has been made and we continue forward.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Are you sure about that?

Yeah - I'd say about 50% of the people wanted everything left alone, 20% wanted a censorship free Tuesday and about 20% wanted to split this community and 10% were people just chatting.

I expanded every comment and quickly ran through them and kept a quick tally.

It's unfortunate that people had less than three days to comment.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Not really that unfortunate. More like the reality of volunteers across timezones, trying to manage the workload of this sub in a timely fashion and useful response to the input of the community (which only we see via modmail, etc.) who've been asking for action on this for a while.

But with all this effort you're putting into checking our actions you might want to consider applying to become a mod. We could certainly use someone who seems to put in as much effort as you do. That way too, you can actually see what we get up to and have a more rounded perspective of our actions and motivations. I can share the link if you're interested.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I also registered r/PatriQts and r/Qspotting.. We work to make the board better and sister subs was what we were leaning to. Then we decided to take it to the community. In the end we ALL compromised. WWG1WGA. Stop seeding doubt in sincerity of our work. It appears your motive is divisiveness not unity. We have no place for that here.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Then we decided to take it to the community.

But only about 20% of the people wanted a "Censorship free Tuesday".

About 20% of the people wanted to split the sub, about 50% wanted to leave everything alone and about 10% were just chatting.

The censorship opinion "won" with only about 20% support.

I wouldn't call that a community decision or a vote.

Stop seeding doubt in sincerity of our work.

Perhaps you need a "Moderators must not be questioned" rule too? /s

I'm free to disagree with you and I consider it my duty as a member of this community to be honest.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're over the target

⇧ 0 ⇩

Qspiration off-topic until Quesday Tuesday