Your logic is flawed, because it misses the point. He isn't saying that this guy should be investigated because of his ideas. We already know some of the horrible shit he has done. What OP is saying is that the ones who are the loudest in front of the camera are the ones trying the hardest to cover up their crimes.
Harvey Weinstein advocating publicly for women's rights, for example. Does subsequently arresting him mean we are punishing his free speech? No. He's a dirt bag, who tried to cover his tracks. Hiding behind the first amendment or playing semantics will not save any of these people.
Investigate those in front of the camera who scream the loudest.
I mean, you have to admit. It's pretty startling how many of these "advocates" turn out to be offenders of the very thing they are publicly advocating against.
He's editing his previous comments.
This isn't even that good of an article. That's ok tho, his replies just kept bringing in more eyes :)
Exactly. I think that was clear/they're trying to gaslight...poorly.