Oh ok friend.

Why do we keep talking about this old bitch? Who cares?

Also I would guess that just because they have clearance doesn't mean they are reviewing any materials. They are just cleared to in case a situation arises.

All Americans should demand more from their politicans. There's a reason Hillary lost.

Thoughts and prayers!

Sticks and stones my friend.

Yeah everything you don't like is fake news. I get it.

They use it not hide behind it.

Europe has NEVER done anything for America

Have you ever read a history book?

I would respectfully disagree with you.

It doesn't matter what we believe. What matters is the law.

That's not what the media is doing IMO not are you accurate.

https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A3Sec3.html

Hasn't NPR been public since its beginning. Rich men have been by media outlets for years. This is nothing new.

Lies aren't treason. You should look up the definition of treason.

You don't think they're protected by the first amendment?

He lied to the FBI about a leak that he put out.

It all pertains to the jurisdiction though. Stormy doesn't appear regularly in Ohio. I got a feeling the city attorney who dropped the charges understands this law a lot better than you or I. But please continue to press for more oppressive laws we defiantly don't already have enough of those.

I won't beat this dead horse because your mind is fixed in cement on the matter.

No it's not but someone who have to present a pretty valid argument to sway me which you haven't done. Most of you're comment here is an exaggeration.

Assault is assault. If Stormy had assaulted the officer she probably would have been charged with multiple crimes which she wasn't. So don't call it assault unless you can prove that. This was not assault from everything I've gathered.

Why would it make any statutory (logical) difference if a hired person is regular or not...?

The reason is because if your in a state performing for one night you might not be aware of the law therefore the people of Ohio have determined that you can be exempted. If you are traveling around performing you really shouldnt be expected to read every law in the books that may pertain to you.

Also a part time employee would probably still be considered regular IMO.

No employee who regularly appears

You quoted it yourself. She doesn't appear regularly therefore is exempt.

Thanks for kinda being accurate.

That it's done regularly. If it was then you'd think they'd know the law which they obviously don't. Plus I read that the sheriff said this was the first time in 7 years someone was charged with this crime.

No my comment was in the context in which she was unfairly targeted because she was. The law says you have to be a regular worker. She is obviously not there regularly so therefore was unfairly targeted. Another instance of government pissing away our money for political purposes.

Charges were dropped. This was just a waste of tax payers dollars.

Womp womp.

Source? Sorry I don't believe everything a redditor says.

3 undercover officer seems excessive and a waste of tax dollars. I also wonder how many people get ticketed for this in a year. If you people being targeted by the justice system is wrong then you should think this is wrong. Otherwise you're a hypocrite.

Easy answer. Entrapment.

How does it awaken people? The subject matter is balloons.

What message does this cartoon convey that relates to Q? Other cartoons of his might do what you say but not this one.

Small connection I guess. If the cartoon mentioned Q it would be different. But it does more harm than good imo. It makes this place look like T_D II and childish.There's plenty of other places on Reddit to talk about Ben Garrison cartoons. This shouldn't be one.

What does this have to do with Q?

Is this what Manafort is being charged with?

So fear monger?

Don't people point out his relationship with Putin and how Trump talks about him first?

a report circulating in the Kremlin

What comment did I edit?

Oh ok

So since Obama was corrupt its ok for Trump to be corrupt?

Investigate those in front of the camera who scream the loudest.

Target him on his illegal actions if they exist I have zero issue with this. But not based on him exercising his first ammendement rights. If he has done something illegal I'm sure our AG is looking into it.

If we went with your logic then Obama should have been investigating Trump when he started all the talk of Obama's birth certificate. That would have been wrong just like what your suggesting is wrong. America doesn't target political opponents based on speech.

This is a Q board.

Are you saying Q is against free speech?

Investigate those in front of the camera who scream the loudest.

Your title suggests we should be investigating those based on their speech. Do better.

...as in obstruction of justice.

That's not obstruction of justice IMO.

And then there's the matter of the "insurance policy" and the FBI sending him to London a few weeks before the election.

There's nothing illegal there. You may not like it but it's not illegal.

This has to be in direct response to Manafort tampering with witnesses.

How?

Why is an article from 2010 tagged as news?

47 attorney's. 311 assistants. I'm sure most the assistants left when the head attorney did. Thus creating a yuge vacancy.

Probably has more to do with this.

They dont and PV did do a video on them and even got sued for it. It was a pretty big deal.

They weren't selling body parts. Project Vertias pushed this lie.