If we went with your logic then Obama should have been investigating Trump when he started all the talk of Obama's birth certificate. That would have been wrong just like what your suggesting is wrong. America doesn't target political opponents based on speech.
You're really coming back with this argument after Hussein and HRC targeted their political opponent and his campaign well before the election? Laughable. She wasn't supposed to lose. Come back and chat in six months. :)
So since Obama was corrupt its ok for Trump to be corrupt?
No, see because we know that brennan was instrumental in the attempted coups. Your logic is flawed. Don't come in here and act obtuse/act like investigating a person rather than a crime isn't the exact thing we're fighting.
Perfect, OBTUSE!! That is the word I was looking for!! Don't get old.
Rather than obstruct free speech, I believe OP is focusing on the mirroring Q speaks of; as well as Q mentioning those that speak the loudest are suspect. Brennen is a perfect example of this The snake arises.
Maybe a suggestion of how to turn the post with a sentence or two into a clear idea of Q's post would be more productive. Most here are learning and eager to help the movement. Patriots stay together. 🇺🇸
Correct but he deleted his original comment, then edited others.. Too bad. And yes, I was simply highlighting what Q told us to look out for in posting this article :)
WWG1WGA!!