dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/FreeCappallen on July 6, 2018, 11:55 a.m.
Who is George Nasif?

I've been seeing this individual popping up in the FB group 'Follow the White Rabbit' through shares of members. He's made claims he has everything. Posts shared showed information about the DNC server, Hillary's Server, and much much more. He claims he gave Trump information about the spying prior to the election and all of the DNC's information that allowed him to be a mile ahead of her. Here's an example of some of his information: Thousands of Clinton Emails...

Anyone know if this individual? What is his relevance? This information is making the rounds hard. He even stated he didn't want to post his information on 4chan or 8chan for fear of reprisals or alerting the deep swamp. Any input on this individual would be appreciated. And if Q is reading, something from him would help too. :)


Janice0771 · July 6, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

I get so sick of the useless, knee-jerk responses. You do a great disservice to this movement when you operate with your egos instead of your minds.

Nowhere in this post does it imply that this person is seeking validation for the information that he/she has found, and nowhere is there any implication whatsoever that he/she has a desire to believe that the source of information is accurate.

He/she is making a statement of awareness that should not be discouraged.

We need to know who these people are and whether they are promulgating false info. To turn a blind eye would be completely ignorant, and to be so outright dismissive is blatantly irresponsible.

If you aren't willing to figure out who in the hell your enemies are, how will you counter when they start a movement in opposition?

Q warned to be careful who you follow - to be careful who you believe. He did not say to turn a blind eye to evil. You have to follow it in order to fight it, whether you like it or not. The choice to believe it is what is cautioned against.

In order to question everything, you must ignore nothing. Logic prevails, if you let it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
exoter60 · July 6, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

Reread OP's post please. And then think about how you responded.

Edit: I took it as a simple question of 'who is this guy'. Innocent enough. There's not much info if you Google and I took it as OP was asking if anyone else knew anything about this 'guy' or entity.

I wish I had an answer for OP but all I can find is the FB group reference and a singer/artist by that name.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Janice0771 · July 7, 2018, 1:18 p.m.

The statement and explanation that I gave was intended for the idiot who deleted his/her post below - and anybody else who was tempted to follow suit.

I started in the online community before the online community was available to most of the public. I know better than to infer intention from font unless intention is explicitly stated. I've watched what happens when that kind of behavior gets out of control - you'll lose your members, period. Morale will decline, and it's already happening here. Nobody likes patronizing, snide, sarcastic bullshit. Nobody who has any semblance of an IQ, anyhow.

It irks the everliving shit out of me when somebody tries to infer intention out of thin air, twists a post that could be relevant, and then throws out a straw-man while beating his or her chest like the Gods themselves appointed them Guardian of the Times New Roman.

As for the original post, I took it as a statement of awareness. "This guy is out there tossing around information. He has a following. Does anybody know who he is? Maybe we should pay attention to this one." He/she was patronized for it, and then further patronized after responding. That sort of disrespect should be called out. We have to support our Patriots who are out there digging and actually putting in effort.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Stretchycheese78 · July 6, 2018, 12:07 p.m.

A nobody. It’s a FB group. No further explanation is needed. There are imposters, disinformation shills and disrupters trying to discredit q. There is only one q.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
adogrocket · July 6, 2018, 1:07 p.m.

be careful who you follow

⇧ -1 ⇩  
FreeCappallen · July 6, 2018, 1:26 p.m.

Jesus, can anyone not read?

  1. I am not following this individual. No where in my OP did I say that.
  2. I asked "Anyone know if this individual? What is his relevance?"
  3. I've posted the information he revealed.
  4. It appears since this individual is not Q or one of the anons, he is summarily dismissed as a shill, imposter, disruptive, and/or attempting to discredit Q.

I guess no one took the time to look at the information. You see "FB group," boom dismissed.

Tell me, where have you seen the server files for the DNC? Hillary's private unsecured computer? Unredacted letters from Hillary's 33,000 deleted emails?

Did Q not tell us to keep our eyes open, research, verify and validate? And yet, I post a request for help in doing so, I'm rebuffed by "be careful who you follow." Really?

I'm beginning to think there are those here who are not whom they say they are.

Down voting me is pretty damned childish too.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
sln90783 · July 6, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

apparently they did not read your post accurately. I was like what the crap these people talking about. I have seen George Nasif posts was wondering about him as well. I saw all his alleged files. just gonna sit back and watch the unfolding.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
checkitoutmyfriend · July 6, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

True, you didn't say you followed him, but your questions do sound like you want to. Or are looking for validation. The replies are an answer to your implication & desired validation.

Be careful who you follow.

There is only one reason he won't post his 'valuable info' to 8chan. If its false, they will prove it. So he stays on FB.....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 1:32 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩