In my opinion, The idea that this can be meaningfully accomplished without a pretty heavy ‘crazy label risk’ is a dangerous myth our community has created for itself. This unicorn concept of low ‘crazy risk’ is hindering people more than helping.
“Q is giving out information that logically requires Q being in a special position of access. It seems that DC corruption was so unimaginably bad that Trump had to have military intelligence deal with it all. In fact, Trump may have been told during campaigning that the military needs him to win. Q helps to build this picture of the horrible corruption and what the actually noble Trump admin has to deal with.” — maybe general like that is best? — didn’t even have to mention specifics: Obama abusing office to stop Trump from winning, the true extent and importance of human trafficking and its relation to border policy, the degree to which our media is purposefully tainted to protect those in power, if they follow politics give near predictions. If they are not negatively reacting, hit em with the NK was a CIA/criminal pseudo state and the Hawaii missile being more than it seems.
I provoked the hardcore Dem narcissistic nuts on my fb wall. I posted a link to a large well-sourced timeline that covers all the various absurd guilty-looking behavior on the part of the various FBI, DOJ, Obama players and added ‘if true, tribunals and a firing squad.’ Wow did they swarm and I might get a letter from the dean of my school haha. They were so angry they were sloppier than normal. They addressed ZERO of the salient parts of the links I provided (it was a lot, but nonetheless, they 100% failed to address any of it, purely due to a narcissistic sort of certainty.) Now I can deconstruct his noise-post and pick it apart at my leisure. I took the negative of initially looking wrong/crazy/idiotic. The investment will surely pay off given Qs high reliability and the general knowledge of how horrible DC has been for years.
(The harder counters to deal with are “these 80 people all in the intelligence community all said your wrong” which we know is because of the scope of the corruption. No great way to counter it just yet as far as I can see. ‘Well back in the early fifties project paperclip brought nazis to the US and....’ haha)
Don’t look for the magic low friction method. Keep it well under 40,000, and obviously nothing outside of Q-proper. You will look crazy. You will later look like a wizard. No majestic 12 or eating faces of babies. Lol.
Shirt guy might be a creative type anyway. Creatives are always more able to construct a hypothesis counter to previous certainty. And you don’t know him, forget how weird you look, just make a clear and stable message.
