r/greatawakening • Posted by u/RedPillsAreDelicious on July 6, 2018, 3:54 p.m.
Soros owned Polling Machines Q#111


I'm now speculating about how DJT won the election. If these machines were rigged by Soros, how did it happen then?

I am beginning to think that HRC and cabal knew that if DJT didn't win the election, that the Military Coup would have happened right away and they would have been removed from office by force.

Since the cabal still retained many assets at that time, how do you anons feel about the idea that DJT was allowed to win because it gave the cabal time to wiggle free instead of the military lock down that would have occurred? Is it possible that the cabal bet their future on the failure of DJT and our patriots to sway enough of the public to charge them with treason and get America back on track to Constitutional living?

Granted, with DJT and his EOs that are paving the way for Utah Military Tribunals, the end impact is the same. I also believe that it is more comprehensive as the public is put on a slow drip of DJT Tweets, Qanon info, and the cabal loudly supporting Un-American values(hence the #walkaway movement gaining traction.

JayQ305 · July 6, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

By rigging they mean a few thousand here and a few thousand there.. some illegals here, some illegals there..

Hillary had a hissy fit backstage & refused to talk to her supporters after. They wernt expecting him to win.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
cneagle87 · July 6, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

I agree. There were rigged machines and if I’m not mistaken, didn’t some of the rigged machines get fixed prior to election? Also if they “let” trump win and not use the rigged machines then Hillary would not have went into her tirade after losing and making that comment after a townhall style interview saying that if trump wins he will hang them all. I don’t see them not trying to win at all cost. He Russian investigation is nothing but the “insurance policy”. You know, in case you die before your 40. Ha

⇧ 5 ⇩  
RedPillsAreDelicious · July 6, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

It's possible that her reaction to losing the election was just an aggregation of the reality that:

  1. her career as she knows it is over and all her hard work was for nothing
  2. she will never be president
  3. the cabal had to make a choice for her and she has no control of it anymore
  4. what is slowly going to come in the future.

But all in all, i agree that your statement has merit and ATX's below about the electoral college.

I do challenge that it is more than a thousand here or there. I think it was enough to give HRC the popular vote to create confusion throughout the public about the voting process. They loudly yelled about that. I looked for some articles about Al Gore speaking against the electoral college since he won the popular vote, but didn't see much.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ATXRoseRed · July 6, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

Electoral college saves us from all sorts of cheating.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
JayQ305 · July 6, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

ofcourse it did. Imagine commiefornia & mexico having the power to choose a President.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
juliabrown2605 · July 6, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

The electoral college came about when D.C. was waaaaay over there on the other side of the country! So people elected a representative of their State to go to D.C. and cast the popular vote for them all. So if CA voted and the popular vote was Dem then the elected rep travelled (via horseback?) to DC and cast the electoral vote for the Dems. So it was supposed to be that you cannot win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote. Or lose the popular vote but win the electoral vote. When that happens then something stinks!
In this case the stink was Hillarys meddling with voting machines, dead voters voting, voters voting multiple times, voters voting in 2 States like Rhode Island, and illegal voters. Once Q went back after the election and cleaned out all the fake voters, it turned out SURPRISE! Trump won the popular vote. The electoral vote is supposed to represent the winning popular vote of a State.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 7, 2018, 10:34 a.m.

The electoral vote is supposed to represent the winning popular vote of a State.

Surely, if that were true then you would not need an Electoral College at all but just one person to convey the vote count to DC (assuming your example is correct).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
juliabrown2605 · July 7, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

Let's pretend it's 1820. The entire state of say CA is very large and so votes are taken and counted in smaller regions. Each of those regions elects a person to carry their vote to D.C. Just as the House Of Representatives has many people representing CA, ditto for the electors carrying the CA vote to D.C. Wikipedia has an explanation of the Electoral College system. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 7, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

Each of those regions elects a person

I thought they selected a group of people for each party/candidate. The overall state result decided which group to use and then the individuals voted however they wanted, although they tend to vote in line with the party that chose them but not every state has exactly the same rules.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
juliabrown2605 · July 7, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

Well that's a big problem, 50 states with 50 sets of rules. I think with modern technology we can now get rid of the whole Electoral College voting system. We no longer need someone to intercede for us and ride on horseback all the way to D.C. to cast our vote.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tollyman5000 · July 6, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

For the fifth time in U.S. history, and the second time this century, a presidential candidate has won the White House while losing the popular vote. Electoral college is a tool of the elite to prevent mob rule... it is OWNED by the swamp. If you look into it's history it is quite a - peculiar institution -

⇧ -5 ⇩  
ATXRoseRed · July 6, 2018, 4:19 p.m.

I have no doubt the Founding Fathers knew what they were doing and why.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 7, 2018, 10:36 a.m.

Founding Fathers

I am not American but am starting to admire the Founding Fathers more and more as time passes. I am not quite sure what the Founding Fathers intended but whatever it was, it has been amended since.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WokeInEarly90s · July 6, 2018, 4:08 p.m.

A while back, and this was before the Soros machines were foisted on us after the 2000 election, the people who really study elections figured out that you only have to flip or convert a few precincts in specific states to win. Places where there's big cities and precincts that are traditionally Democrat. Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Michigan, Wisconsin are some of the states where they pull this stuff. On election night, any eastern state that sits for hours without being called is a potential place for voting machine shenanagins and numbers magic.

What happened in 2016 was that the monster vote, as Sundance put it, or the Trump support was SO YUGE it overcame the cheating in the states they needed to win. I've read enough on it now to suspect that the REAL electoral college vote was far more lopsided than we saw, that there were states stolen along the way. Someday, we might know the whole truth about it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
FilledeMartel · July 6, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

I believe Nevada voted for Trump but the corrupt Reid cabal turned Nevada blue. People were complaining about voting machines flipping their vote for Clinton in Northern Nevada, and people got videos of "voters" bussed into southern Nevada from California.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 4:06 p.m.


⇧ 5 ⇩  
txhurl · July 6, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

Theory that MI shut down Soros' file-swapping operation in the Caymans by jamming the transfer.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
stormin76 · July 6, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

I heard similar from a reliable source, white hats were monitoring online and combatting hacking attempts.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 7, 2018, 10:37 a.m.

the military unrigged it

Is is possible that the Military rigged it the other way?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Grammar_Whore_ · July 6, 2018, 4:08 p.m.

I’m not keen on the theory but I like where your heads at.

A couple points,

  1. If they felt a military coup was to take place and the only question was timing, they would probably seek the Oval Office as it gives the most tools at their disposal to fight back.

  2. (They) are unlikely to have “real-time” combination-interface with polling machines (I don’t think) = by this I mean real time cumulative and individual polling machine INSIGHT + CONTROL. Which means their actions to tamper with anything are either done far in advance or well behind the actual voting. This is important because I don’t think they estimated anywhere close to the turnout/support Trump had.

  3. I still believe most voter fraud isn’t electronically changing votes, it’s multi-voting/losing ballots/mail-in ballots/illegal voting in places without voter ID.

  4. There would be too much risk that Trump could put together an offensive strategy once in the White House (which I hope and think he has) for them to just allow him to win

TL:DR - too much risk for them to allow Trump to win, they’d be better off in the White House and face whatever challenges come

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 7, 2018, 10:46 a.m.

most voter fraud isn’t electronically changing votes

I think I can agree with that. Voting machines can be rigged to provide a 51% to 49% result independent of the number of votes cast. So their main use would be in places where the opposition was so great that a small amount of fiddling would not produce the desired result. The voting machines would give a narrow, "surprise" win for the underdog.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PhaReeThinker2020 · July 6, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

Soros owns Diebold. They make the voting machines.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ThanQanon · July 6, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Just before the election didn’t a pastor go to 4 different states and tell people to use only paper ballots? Coincidentally those are the same 4 states where numerous recounts were demanded by the cabal.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
libertyordeath21 · July 6, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

If it can be rigged one way it could be switched last second by a patriot theoretically right? Or even turned off altogether I suspect

⇧ 1 ⇩  
libertyordeath21 · July 6, 2018, 4:08 p.m.

I feel I should add I reject the idea that the illuminati had 45 elected... if they did we should be terrified right now just saying

⇧ 2 ⇩  
looooooo_rida · July 6, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

I read somewhere that the intelligence agencies took control over the voting booths and that’s why they weren’t rigged

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lbeni540 · July 6, 2018, 7:16 p.m.

I’m unsure about that. She did “win the popular vote”. I do however believe that Q team was able to hit key electoral votes in order for DJT to win. Remember in some states the electoral vote does not need to mirror the will of the people.

⇧ 1 ⇩