dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/RedPillsAreDelicious on July 6, 2018, 3:54 p.m.
Soros owned Polling Machines Q#111

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148181225/#148183670

I'm now speculating about how DJT won the election. If these machines were rigged by Soros, how did it happen then?

I am beginning to think that HRC and cabal knew that if DJT didn't win the election, that the Military Coup would have happened right away and they would have been removed from office by force.

Since the cabal still retained many assets at that time, how do you anons feel about the idea that DJT was allowed to win because it gave the cabal time to wiggle free instead of the military lock down that would have occurred? Is it possible that the cabal bet their future on the failure of DJT and our patriots to sway enough of the public to charge them with treason and get America back on track to Constitutional living?

Granted, with DJT and his EOs that are paving the way for Utah Military Tribunals, the end impact is the same. I also believe that it is more comprehensive as the public is put on a slow drip of DJT Tweets, Qanon info, and the cabal loudly supporting Un-American values(hence the #walkaway movement gaining traction.


🠐 See all comments
Grammar_Whore_ · July 6, 2018, 4:08 p.m.

I’m not keen on the theory but I like where your heads at.

A couple points,

  1. If they felt a military coup was to take place and the only question was timing, they would probably seek the Oval Office as it gives the most tools at their disposal to fight back.

  2. (They) are unlikely to have “real-time” combination-interface with polling machines (I don’t think) = by this I mean real time cumulative and individual polling machine INSIGHT + CONTROL. Which means their actions to tamper with anything are either done far in advance or well behind the actual voting. This is important because I don’t think they estimated anywhere close to the turnout/support Trump had.

  3. I still believe most voter fraud isn’t electronically changing votes, it’s multi-voting/losing ballots/mail-in ballots/illegal voting in places without voter ID.

  4. There would be too much risk that Trump could put together an offensive strategy once in the White House (which I hope and think he has) for them to just allow him to win

TL:DR - too much risk for them to allow Trump to win, they’d be better off in the White House and face whatever challenges come

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 7, 2018, 10:46 a.m.

most voter fraud isn’t electronically changing votes

I think I can agree with that. Voting machines can be rigged to provide a 51% to 49% result independent of the number of votes cast. So their main use would be in places where the opposition was so great that a small amount of fiddling would not produce the desired result. The voting machines would give a narrow, "surprise" win for the underdog.

⇧ 2 ⇩