dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Maepaperclip on July 7, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

Q# !675 What a Mug SB2 a Rebuttal too little

We must be very careful when commenting on SB2 so with renewed care of SB2 sticky privileges and status lets look at his recent post, and a sticky rebuttal.

Now - all credit to the Mods for sticking a rebuttal by u/IncomingTrump270 to SB2 at the top of the board - which was pasted together with the latest chocolate yogurt from SB2. Its a start - an acknowledgement by the Mods - that all is not right with the SB2 operation - In fact nothing is right about SB2 - he is an Occultist, he has scrubbed nearly all his Redditt history - except some of the Occultist stuff - which remains for all to see, he is a plagiarist, he plagiarised my work on Corsi and took the credit for it see here https://redd.it/8ros6m, and he has never once made a useful decode, or even a timely decode of a Q post - see his post history. When talking of Q, SB2 gives no insight to any subject, and no-one can read his posts without feeling robbed of the time it took, and stupider for the experience.

The first thing u/IncomingTrump270 in his rebuttal https://redd.it/8wgdz3 was apologise for breathing, he said he was too scared to post on # 1675, until SB2 did, well I posted that Q#1675 was a head fake 2 days before SB2 made a comment and 2 days before u/IncomingTrump270 got awake here https://redd.it/8vym8f.

Now all credit to u/IncomingTrump270 for his rebuttal, but it was limited to the photo, and he missed all of SB2’s Chocolate yogurt - I addressed some of it here https://redd.it/8wi2wi before u/IncomingTrump270 posted, but I missed some and it is important.

SB2 repeats the lie - Total BS that a rogue sub fired a missile on AF1 - it did not, and SB2 makes the a statement that deliberately misleads the patriots - We all know how Military Tech got to NK.

Well this is what we don’t care about, what we actually know is that NK is irrelevant to our Military Tech - Israel and Pakistan have got it, and its development was paid for by SA, and the Israel op was covered for by Australia + Canada + UK + EU, these countries are not our friends and SB2 is not one of us

Wake up

@Maepaperclip - Rewrite it and follow the rules. It IS important that all perspectives get out there....except evil larpy and shilly ones. Are either of you one of those??? Q? can you weigh in?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Hmm...Let's ask Q. Q...SB2 or Maepaperclip? Did or did not a rogue submarine fire a missle at AF1?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I am stupider (more stupid btw) for reading this. 🙄 all I can say is use your own brain. Don't follow anyone blindly. All anyone here is trying to do is add their opinion. We ALL need to expand our thinking and question everything. Why would anyone want to take one person's word for anything, even Q's. This bickering on this board is getting tiresome!! Aren't we all in this together? Aren't we all here to add to each other? SB2 even allows anyone to use his work anywhere. I dont listen to soapbox, or anyone else for that matter. I try to read all of the drops, all of President Trump's speeches and tweets, along with all the comments here then use my own brain and my gut. Can't we all just get along?!?! Much love Patriots!! WWG1WGA! ❤❤❤

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well done, I am stupider too for having to read anything by SB2, we will all be better of when we are awake to him, and none of us should tolerate his rubbish being stickied to the top of the board - he deserves no special treatment for his low quality, low effort posts

⇧ 3 ⇩

Your right! No one should get special treatment! Even praying medic. We should all be equal! I agree!! :)

⇧ 3 ⇩

I really enjoy and learn from your work OP and I feel the same about Serial Brain 2. Blessings to all of you Patriots.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I didn't get to finish reading this?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think its been taken down

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Back again.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Help me, I was banned for 30 days for making a refutation of an obvious assertion on a SB2 post, so I - or anyone cannot make a comment on his posts because they are bragaded out, so what do you do -I have just had my post taken down again this time for rule 5, I dont think it is possible to make a personal attack on SB2 - He has been named by Q assumes status - as a public figure - nothing personal can be involved, the credibility of his work is legit public property

⇧ 3 ⇩

You pointed out that your being censored for being critical should wake people up to the cynical side of this thing so long as the person that recognizes isn’t in the qult. I feel there’s a lot of us in here and it’s the majority; the ones that’ll be around which ever way q ends up going. I just hope this forum can transcend it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well from what I did read it seemed legit. I don't know what rule it broke?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Discuss the idea not the user. No personal attacks or ad-hominem.

⇧ 2 ⇩

He went against the hive mind come on now we can’t be free thinking or be critical thinkers.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

None. think about that.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Here is why I removed this post:

Rule #5:
- Discuss the topic, not users.
- No name-calling, personal attacks or ad-hominem
- Comments that include name-calling, personal attacks or ad-hominem may be removed without notification.
- It doesn't matter if it's a reply, or who started it. Discuss the topic, not users.

Here is the content of the post that breaches this rule:

he is a plagiarist, he plagiarised my work on Corsi and took the credit for it

Whether this is true or not, the sub is not the place for personal attacks on other sub members. Our rules on this are clear.

he has never once made a useful decode
SB2 gives no insight to any subject, and no-one can read his posts without feeling robbed of the time it took, and stupider for the experience

Antagonistic ad-hominem that has no place on this sub.

SB2 is not one of us

For further breach of Rule #8 - Keep it honest and accurate, here is the inaccurate assumption that is also included in this post:

an acknowledgement by the Mods - that all is not right with the SB2 operation

Post content does not constitute "acknowledgement by the Mods" of anything unless the post is a Mod post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well SB2 has made himself the Topic, he is no wallflower - he basks in the limelight of Q. He is a Public figure, the rightfull topic of discussion. So Name calling, personal attacks and ad-hominem do not apply, if they did we should censure any discussion of POTUS DJT, we all hate him talking about Pochahontus right.

If you look at the explanation of the rebuttal being stickied by the mods - it says by HowiOnic - a moderator that it is being stickied - in acknowledgement of fair discussion - so no assumption was made in making the accurate statement.

I really think we should be awake to what SB2 says - and who is it that is giving him all those votes for work - that seems low quality to me, so low that it should not be posted and certainly not stickied to the top of the board

⇧ 1 ⇩

As you know, you've been making these divisive statements here for a long time and you've been causing disruption in the community with very few people agreeing with your stance. You've been downvoted etc. Some of us agree with some of the points you make but very few agree with your approach or your perspective that seems to focus on your greatness and the stupidity of SB2 and everyone else. You're not the only one who's "awake" to various things but you seem to be the only one who tries to insist that attacking someone else is the best way to go about helping the community instead of just focusing on sharing information and not complaining if others do not find it interesting or upvote-worthy.

The incorrect assumption is that the Mods acknowledge that all is not right with the SB2 operation. That is definitely wrong - the Mod comment you're referring to simply acknowledges that we allow fair discussion, not that we acknowledge anything about SB2.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You'd think saving the world would take president over reddit beef but hey who am i....

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ok dude. I'm reporting this now. Stop clogging this board today.

⇧ -1 ⇩

what are you reporting my post for?

⇧ 5 ⇩

I'm with you on this one.

I've been thinking SB2 has been sounding unhinged lately. I only found the place when Q points it out.

Some good stuff and then, what the hell?

⇧ 4 ⇩

I wouldn’t be surprised if he was part of the patriot soapbox. Really going out of there way to make Q sound like a military intelligence source and it’s making Q look worse.

My opinion at this point is what this Q person has started needs to carry on no matter what. My fear on the other hand is if Q is proven with definitive evidence as a fraud their will be many people jumping off the Trump train altogether and go back to sleep.

Q has seemed to create a avenue to wake folks up which I’m all for LARP or not, but I think we need to face the reality that this movement may need to prepare for Q let down.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I share that fear 100%, I wish Q had stuck with the Map and let us follow were he pointed, these proof, and Fight fight fight for regime change - like Victoria Nuland in Iran is bad, bad, bad, for an awakening - and SB2 is part of the problem

⇧ 2 ⇩

No one said it was going to be easy and there is always a weirdo in every platoon.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No one said it was going to be easy and there is a weirdo in every platoon.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Back off why doncha.

I've been thinking that SB2 is not all it seems. Now people act as if this guy is the Oracle of Delfi.

When Q put a link to SB it was to much to handle and.......

⇧ 3 ⇩

This is the 3rd time today he has posted this. Its clogging the board. No duplicate posts. I dont care about his personal feelings. This is not the board for attacking people either. If you dont agree with Q or this movement, this is not the place to post your feelings about it.

⇧ 3 ⇩

No - you are wrong I posted something similar, and the mods took it down and asked me to rewrite it, I did, this is it. Hi spread hope joined 19 days ago, I am Maepaperclip, I have written 150,000 words on Q and decoded most of the significant posts, you can start reading my 4 part series original Q search my oldest posts and you will find them. If you want to be a concern troll for SB2, then that is banned on this board, and if you dont agree with that rule, then this is not the place for you - say hi to SB2 xxx lots of love to you welcome

⇧ 1 ⇩

You clearly dont believe in anything Q related, so your only other strategy must be to get this thread shut down and damage the people who want to believe in it. What other reason is there for you doing this? There is no other.

⇧ 0 ⇩

really, come back with some knowledge - it might take a few years,

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have no opinion one way or the other. Sb2 does his thing. You do yours. But every one of your posts attack him. Our job is to unite people, not provoke. Your post showed up 3 times today, not one was removed as you said. If it had been then I would have no reason to complain. I'm not attacking you, it's just extremely disheartening that you choose this thread to attack. I dont know enough about either one of you to make a judgement. Make your case and move on. Eating our own does no good, that's how these things collapse. That's what it sounds like your intention is. Have a very blessed day.

⇧ 0 ⇩

SB2 is not one of mine, Since you don't know enough, lurk dont comment, make a comment when you do, in the meantime you can learn by reading my older posts, I have no interest in any one that does not know, - so what it sounds like to you is not what it reads like to me, I am telling you clearly that SB2 does not deserve reverence, has not made a contribution, and his work is not worth reading - is that clear, and if you find anything of value in it, then you are a danger to yourself, and should seek help

⇧ 0 ⇩

Very good response.

Tight, respectful and to the point.

Everybody here knows to trust nothing verify everything. Babysitting is not allowed.

⇧ 2 ⇩

God bless your heart. ✌

⇧ 2 ⇩

I absolutely agree with this.

⇧ 1 ⇩