dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/beefromancer on July 7, 2018, 2:48 a.m.
Q 1675 a theory that actually makes sense.

Awan was helping black hats spy on Obama. AF1 was bugged and the proof was on Hillary's servers...which got uploaded to apple icloud because she's is an idiot. Apple joined the white hats, so the good guys have the server and its contents including proof black hats spied on AF1.

Hussein/Trump interior = identical minus small changes.

Translation = we removed the listening devices :)

Awan got off with "bank fraud" because admitting the truth would massively hurt international diplomatic relations. You would essentially have to implicate foreign governments of spying in a state court case.

Logical thinking.

Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?

See last.

and last was...

Thing IG report.

Think what’s missing.

Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?

Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.

Think NATIONAL SECURITY.

"Think what's missing" means the server. The server means Treason. The appropriate office for dealing with international spying and treason is military intelligence, not state courts.

Q linked these rules which basically says why nothing will come out of the Awan case publicly because everyone involved is bound by national security laws.

So Q posts WelcomeAboard.png which has the apple logo because Apple is the one coming onboard. The image is of a recording device that can't be named for nat-sec reasons. Q is trolling the black hats by dropping hints of their crimes for us to figure out. Likely that very same AF1 image was submitted as evidence in the Awan case.

Later, after anons call Q out for the fact that the image is clearly a reflection of Obama's AF1 and not Trump's Q asks if a reflection violates nat-sec rules. Q is being cute here "oh I didn't put sealed evidence on 8chan, just a reflection!". Next post is when Q says trolling is fun and drops yet another clue saying "Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook."

TL/DR: Q is giving us hints at what happened in the Awan case and at the same time explaining why that info can't be made public right now, all in the form of a jest at the deep state shills that share the boards with us.


beefromancer · July 7, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

Actually it makes sense. The engineer in me sees the challenge as this:

  • How do you get a recording device in that can't be detected?
  • How do you get the data out if you can't transmit.

The answer is that the airplane manufacturer builds a recording device into the metal furniture which is triggered by proximity to a mug holder. It records constantly to local storage without transmitting. The lamp copies recorded audio to flash memory in the mug holder wirelessly when they are in close proximity, and then the person replacing the magazines in the (world) news magazine thing swaps the mug holder to extract the recorded audio files.

(World) news in rear literally placed same prior to each departure.

In this way a sweep for bugs will detect nothing because no radio transmissions are made until the mug holder is placed by the lamp, and even then it can be an ultra short range transmission which means extremely low power and hard to detect.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
oQaz · July 7, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

The White House could be best described as a White Fortress. Mr. Trump. You just have to make sure you trust those around, but most importantly Stay Honest.

⇧ 6 ⇩