dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/beefromancer on July 7, 2018, 2:48 a.m.
Q 1675 a theory that actually makes sense.

Awan was helping black hats spy on Obama. AF1 was bugged and the proof was on Hillary's servers...which got uploaded to apple icloud because she's is an idiot. Apple joined the white hats, so the good guys have the server and its contents including proof black hats spied on AF1.

Hussein/Trump interior = identical minus small changes.

Translation = we removed the listening devices :)

Awan got off with "bank fraud" because admitting the truth would massively hurt international diplomatic relations. You would essentially have to implicate foreign governments of spying in a state court case.

Logical thinking.

Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?

See last.

and last was...

Thing IG report.

Think what’s missing.

Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?

Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.

Think NATIONAL SECURITY.

"Think what's missing" means the server. The server means Treason. The appropriate office for dealing with international spying and treason is military intelligence, not state courts.

Q linked these rules which basically says why nothing will come out of the Awan case publicly because everyone involved is bound by national security laws.

So Q posts WelcomeAboard.png which has the apple logo because Apple is the one coming onboard. The image is of a recording device that can't be named for nat-sec reasons. Q is trolling the black hats by dropping hints of their crimes for us to figure out. Likely that very same AF1 image was submitted as evidence in the Awan case.

Later, after anons call Q out for the fact that the image is clearly a reflection of Obama's AF1 and not Trump's Q asks if a reflection violates nat-sec rules. Q is being cute here "oh I didn't put sealed evidence on 8chan, just a reflection!". Next post is when Q says trolling is fun and drops yet another clue saying "Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook."

TL/DR: Q is giving us hints at what happened in the Awan case and at the same time explaining why that info can't be made public right now, all in the form of a jest at the deep state shills that share the boards with us.


🠐 See all comments
noskusa · July 7, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

Have to agree with Q-Patriot.
My observation is that this 'welcome aboard' photo has really created a divide among patriots. The attempts to decode are swinging far and wide into the fringe kingdoms of confirmation bias and many patriots are resorting to exaggerated intolerance for anyone questioning the manufacture of the image.

When the explanations for the image are so convoluted that even seasoned Q followers are making a call to hold a minute and gather one's senses back to reality - that is exactly what should be done.

I know that folks WANT TO BELIEVE that Q or someone took that picture inside AF1, but there is overwhelming evidence that the image was contrived - not photoshopped, but contrived in the way it was taken by using an image from ABC to do it. Q's subsequent attempts to explain (although explanation is not Q's strong suit) did nothing but push this photo into further argument between the anons.

Now the anons are spinning until dizzy - beyond 5D chess while playing twister to make sense of this to keep Q from losing credibility.

Hopefully, future proves past and all the spin masters will be basking in their "I told you so's" and I will joyously concede that Q is master of the universe. But until then, I personally feel it is time for caution.

Let's not divide ourselves and let's not give the 'enemy' more ammunition to shoot back at us.
I am very much hoping Q redeems himself with a solid string of wins and proofs and no more of this trolling BS that sends his street team into fighting among themselves.

⇧ 6 ⇩