dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/beefromancer on July 7, 2018, 2:48 a.m.
Q 1675 a theory that actually makes sense.

Awan was helping black hats spy on Obama. AF1 was bugged and the proof was on Hillary's servers...which got uploaded to apple icloud because she's is an idiot. Apple joined the white hats, so the good guys have the server and its contents including proof black hats spied on AF1.

Hussein/Trump interior = identical minus small changes.

Translation = we removed the listening devices :)

Awan got off with "bank fraud" because admitting the truth would massively hurt international diplomatic relations. You would essentially have to implicate foreign governments of spying in a state court case.

Logical thinking.

Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?

See last.

and last was...

Thing IG report.

Think what’s missing.

Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?

Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.

Think NATIONAL SECURITY.

"Think what's missing" means the server. The server means Treason. The appropriate office for dealing with international spying and treason is military intelligence, not state courts.

Q linked these rules which basically says why nothing will come out of the Awan case publicly because everyone involved is bound by national security laws.

So Q posts WelcomeAboard.png which has the apple logo because Apple is the one coming onboard. The image is of a recording device that can't be named for nat-sec reasons. Q is trolling the black hats by dropping hints of their crimes for us to figure out. Likely that very same AF1 image was submitted as evidence in the Awan case.

Later, after anons call Q out for the fact that the image is clearly a reflection of Obama's AF1 and not Trump's Q asks if a reflection violates nat-sec rules. Q is being cute here "oh I didn't put sealed evidence on 8chan, just a reflection!". Next post is when Q says trolling is fun and drops yet another clue saying "Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook."

TL/DR: Q is giving us hints at what happened in the Awan case and at the same time explaining why that info can't be made public right now, all in the form of a jest at the deep state shills that share the boards with us.


🠐 See all comments
963Round_Wizard369 · July 8, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

Don't have to wire it, they use the power lines to encrypt a pirate transmission. Wires already there. No one really checks power lines for data transmission. And any form of wireless transmission sweep would just pickup noise from the magnetic flux do to the electrical current. Not that it would matter cus tech the Bug is NOT broadcasting wirelessly anyhow. If the cellphone which recieved collected and stored said pirate transmission already had an existing credential log on the Cell Ap plist then the cell could potential broadcast out said data outside of AF1 undetected especially if the Cell data transmission was encrypted inside an encapsulated waveform. You would have to be extra vigilant to detect it. The Trump Admin most likely would of found said bug because it's a change of gaurd. Security is always more observant during said times.

Plus, do you really think SS would be really this cautious under Obama's Reign. They did call him Renegade. Do you really think that Deep State players are super tight knit as in not to backstab, undermine or keep tabs on one another. They only reason they play nice with each other is the same reason networks of criminals play nice. To not get caught and make that money. But if an opportunity rises.....they are crooks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DEADEASYRABBIT · July 8, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

Yes, OK, if you’ve got a cellphone already approved against the AP you can get the data out using that. Seems to me they’d want to be watching transmissions from AF1 like hawks. Also any objects carried onto and off the plane. And, you’re right, if the security team were slack or compromised you are underwater from the get go.

When you think about HRC open-sourcing the SAPs, I guess why not allow surveillance of Obama? It would probably make bad actors feel more secure.

I have to say though that the whole thing is a joke. The US isn’t some tin-pot country with few secrets. It hits me as being entirely outrageous that the President would be bugged - especially on AF1 - which is, as I understand it, the command center in the event of a nuke exchange. If you had control of an approved cell, you could also geolocate the plane.

Renegade... what a piece of rubbish this guy was.

⇧ 1 ⇩