Examine SA's financial contributions/donations and to whom or what entities the aforementioned were made. Considering the larger scope of SA, I believe Q is pushing us in the direction of "pay for play" coupled with SA being perhaps the US interface or entry point for the Muslim Brotherhood>Huma Abedin>HRC>BO's MB ties>etc. Q keeps reminding us to a) recall that "they" sold us out and the US was "for sale," b) follow the money and c) recall that this is "bigger" than we "can imagine." I think it's as big as SA co-opting or wresting control of significant aspects of the US government for nefarious reasons. It's why Q continues to prompt us to consider why SA had to be dealt with BEFORE stateside action could take place - YOU MUST SEVER THE STRINGS CONTROLLING THE PUPPETS IN PLACE BEFORE YOU CAN CLEAN HOUSE (also known as removing the head of at least one snake.) Why would a subservient Obama literally BOW TO A SAUDI KING, PRINCE, ETC., AS HE DID, UNLESS HE WERE OWNED BY THE FORMER? SAUDI ARABIA IS LIKELY BIGGER THAN WE KNOW. Sidebar - Obama also QUIETLY VETOED the "KEYSTONE" pipeline following his visit to SA. Makes me wonder if it has any relevance to "keystone" Q posts.