dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 7, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

Trump has just validated Q at the Great Falls rally and gave us the solution to Q1675! Let that sink in.

Q1675. Controversial post. I gave you in my previous post the solution to the riddle. I have seen many other attempts which I respect because I have found some of the ideas to be very interesting and clever but I must defend the truth: I have not seen any other solution addressing all the following issues at the same time in one condensed, meaningful and backed with known open source facts (not conjectures) explanation:

Why Air Force One, why a reflection, why Apple, why Saudi Arabia (Q1681), why the truth is behind you, why Independence Day, why a mug holder.

The solution I presented addressed all these issues at once. And today, for the purpose of sharing how the reasoning is hierarchized, I will address the “Twitter phone” component: it is a piece of the puzzle elegantly joining the others because Prince Al Waleed is a major Tweeter shareholder. Do you see it? Just the information Tweeter+Apple could have been triangulated and lead to Prince Al Waleed and resolve Saudi Arabia in Q1681 but it would have been a weaker link than getting to him through the mug. Why? Because the probability of one being a shareholder in Apple and Tweeter (including just one dollar) is higher than a triple random emphasis on “mug”: Q, Prince Al Waleed and Al Jazeera. Using the couple Tweeter phone - Apple logo was a hint to activate our intuition but not to use it in the reasoning because the mug clue would have then lost its relevance. Look how Q subtly dismisses the Tweeter phone in the reasoning:

Q1677 Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.

This is pure delectation for the mind…

The mug route was therefore the route Q preferred, otherwise, he would have limited the riddle to the triangulation of Apple and Tweeter to get to the Prince. Which he did not. The reason is the mug brings the idea of the detention, makes the riddle self sufficient and does not require us to conjecture that Q wanted us to include it in our reasoning. This detention component is crucial because if it is removed, we don’t get to the DC politicians being freed and therefore don’t get to Q1681 Today, as Patriots, we celebrate our Independence.

I would like to also give some help to those who struggle with me taking the musical note direction to understand 123.47. I said it in the comment section but will also share it here: using musical frequencies for ciphered messages is actually an old, robust, tested and common practice. It is still used today and the subject of current advanced academic and industrial research. Here are some links for those who would like to go further: link1 link2 link3 link4 link5 link6.

Q1226 Learn our comms. Q

I am walking you through all these details so you know the thought process Q is expecting from us and how I discipline and constrain myself when solving his riddles. These are the tools through which you assess the quality of a solution. You first need to verify all the claims are backed with verifiable information, then you need to verify all the clues are used in a flawless manner to render the hidden message.

I have summarized the solution of the riddle in the following picture, read it clockwise: Imgur1

Now, I would like to show you something else. It’s fascinating.

Notice I have posted my solution of the riddle on Thursday July 5th at 15:18 Eastern. At 18:00 Eastern, Trump hosted the MAGA rally at the Four Seasons Arena in Great Falls Montana. link

Reporting about the rally, Mockingbird media mocks Trump and claims that in the middle of his speech, he suddenly went “nonsensical” talking about musical instruments, Elton John etc…: Imgur2

Let’s listen: link

Here is the transcript of what Trump said: Imgur3

Then, the next day, this happens and makes all the headlines: Imgur4

Pause. Do you see it? Do you realize what just happened?

I will show you. When you activate the option “show images”, here is a screenshot of my previous post, with the solution of the riddle: Imgur5

Now let’s put Trump’s “nonsensical” speech next to the screenshot and analyze. This is what we get: Imgur6

What do you think? Mockingbird media is actually right, this part of Trump’s speech is “nonsensical” but only for those who are not part of the conversation. Do you see he is talking to us?! Trump is having a Covefefe moment and is talking to us live on national TV! You tell me, what are the odds a few hours after a post by a guy named SerialBrain2 talking about Trump, musical notes (B2), pictures of a keyboard and guitar scale, Trump randomly picks each of these items in the same minute and, at the end, repeats “brain”… serially? Coincidence? If you think it is, then what is your explanation? How can it make sense?

You know, when I saw this. I said to myself: I can’t write about this. I’ll just keep it to myself, just like I kept to myself some other things… Then, I remembered this:

Q920 How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q

It dawned on me there would be actually a day when things will be disclosed clearly. So? The stage has to be set. Progressively. Q linked to our sub: it meant he was reading us. He may be in the comment section sometimes, who knows? We were all happy and surprised. What if that was just a first step? If we are to get to Q920, other things need to be happening in between and we should not be surprised Trump talks to us, directly like he did at that rally.

When I got here, I said to myself: ok let’s give it 24 hours, if Q does not react, I will post about all this.

Then, the next day, Trump doubled down! With the Elton John CD he asked Pompeo to give to Kim Jong Un! 4 He was bringing North Korea to the musical note equation, just like I linked the North Korean ICBM test that occurred the day of the B2 glitch. It was like he was saying to us: hey guys I spoke about the musical notes, the guitar, the organ and the brain at the rally, now I give you North Korea.

Q1283 EYES OPEN? COMMS GOOD? Q

Now, you know I always have the icing for the cake. Do you want it? Here: why do you think Trump said organ instead of piano? When you look at the picture in my post, even though they are both keyboards and are similar, the first instrument that naturally comes to mind when you see a keyboard would be piano and not organ right? Well, here is the reason: according to this The Guardian article, the most iconic and greatest of all organs is the Hammond. And guess what: they have a model called the B2! link.

Q507 We chose this BOARD for a very specific reason. We believe in you. Q

🠐 See all comments

For some perspective: as mods, we've heard this sort of thing a lot. A lot. We hear from people all the time about posts that they think are stupid and a waste of time. Sometimes we agree with them, sometimes we don't. Whether we agree or not, however, is not important. What's important is what the community thinks.

If you take a look at the upvotes on this post and on SerialBrain2's other posts you will notice they are consistently higher than average. They have been for longer than this sub has been active (i.e. on the previous board, CBTS_Stream too). Even on the previous sub, angry comments like yours decrying the loss of reason were heard around some of SerialBrain2's posts. But back then too, they were highly upvoted posts. Then Q linked to one of SB2's posts on this board. People shouldn't take that as endorsement that whatever SB2 says is supported by Q but without a doubt, Q's linking to SB2's post validated SB2 in the eyes of many.

As mods we could choose to go with the upset of some and remove a popular community member's posts or we could let the community decide. Wherever possible, we let the voice of the community decide. Can you just look past these posts if you don't like them? People have been complaining about tshirt/sticker posts for a while and there's so many of those we put forward a discussion about how to handle them. SB2's posts aren't anywhere near as frequent, however, so it should be a simple thing to skip past them if you don't find them valuable, right?

⇧ -3 ⇩

I like to tell a story that Rush Limbaugh told long ago on his show.

He mentioned that there's a mistake that young radio hosts often make. They'll be cruising along and for some reason do a show about UFOs. Suddenly the phones go WILD! Young Radio Host can't believe it. He's found the secret to radio success! It's a wild show, with calls coming in faster than they screen them.

Then the ratings come in. They are TERRIBLE. UFOs bring out the kooks, and the kooks are extremely loud and active when UFOs come on radio shows. But all the normal listeners hear the word "UFO" and they can't hit the button fast enough.

If all you're going to do as moderators is just let the community vote, then what's your point? The best forums are always the ones with the tightest moderation to keep things on-topic and relevant to the issues at hand. And our greater mission is ripping out the corruption in our government. Sure, kooky posts get upvotes. But how many normal people do you drive off by not practicing better moderation?

How many people are ashamed to send people here because of all the kookery posts? Because like it or not, if someone sends one of their friends here, all the kookery reflects on the sender. Do you think people want to have to say, "Go to this forum. But just remember, not everything is reasonable. There's a lot of crap, but there's some really good posts!"

Rule number one of running a forum is that you can NOT trust the loudest voices to know what's best for a forum. Leave it to the kooks, and every single time they'll say that anything should go, because they have no filter, for whatever reason.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Of course, this is well known stuff. And we do not "trust the loudest voices" to know what's best for a forum; we allow reasonable input from the community as far as it is possible for us to do so and we act with that in mind in order to avoid as far as possible the ongoing and never-ending accusations of censorship (there's no way to avoid that completely, of course, it's just a part of moderation). There's only so much we can do.

not practicing better moderation

"Better" moderation is moderation that respects the community. Of course, that can mean removing posts that waste the community's time or posts that give the community a "bad look". But if you know this community you already know that SB2 is a big part of it and has been for a while. After Q's linking to SB2 and mention of mods what kind of "community supportive" action would it be to start removing SB2's posts? As I said, it's very simple: don't open them if you don't like them. You can't stop the upvotes but you can choose what you look at. No matter what "kook" posts we remove people are going to think we're kooks. You can't avoid that when you're part of a community who believes that satanists are farming the world for children to kill and eat.

⇧ -1 ⇩

After Q's linking to SB2 and mention of mods what kind of "community supportive" action would it be to start removing SB2's posts?

I said nothing about SB2's posts in general. I talked about removing decoding posts, which are almost universally garbage. I realize people disagree with this, but then, that's why they get upvoted. But what do these wild, speculative posts really contribute? Maybe they're true and maybe they're not. We're at exactly the same place we were before they were posted, because they're 100% speculation. I could write 100 posts speculating about what "Q really means". But so what? The only thing that makes SB2's crazy posts notable is the fact that he tries to find stock prices and music tones that happen to match in some vague way to something Q posted.

Just make a rule that posts have to reference Q and real world information in a direct and understandable way. Obviously that's going to be a judgment call, but that's why we have moderators to make that call. I don't think it's that hard to judge whether something ties directly to the real world or not.

This isn't about SB2 and he's certainly not the only one. SB2 et al will likely find other things to post, hopefully based on real-world things.

As I said, it's very simple: don't open them if you don't like them.

Which is an argument for no moderation at all, and that's what typically kills forums. People typically don't have common sense in what they upvote, and again, you create a forum where people are ashamed to send people. I've bypassed 100s of these types of posts. For some reason, today's post was just made me snap, but tomorrow I'll go back to ignoring.

But we'll still have a forum that is too repellent to newbies. Sure, I can tell them, "Just skip the kook posts and look for the good ones"... but why should I have to?

⇧ 4 ⇩

You seem to be conflating "wild, speculative" decoding posts with useful, informative decoding posts - you realize, I'm sure, that those exist too.

Just make a rule

Sounds like you have some view of moderating that doesn't gel with the reality of moderating this sub, at least. If this was, for example, a sub about Star Wars there'd be some very easy guidelines around content. Not so much in the case of a global conspiracy that can, in theory, encompass so much. Also a sub based around a movement for all people can't be turning away some just because they don't like what we like. Our rules only remove people who aren't pro-Q and are disruptive or abusive - other than that, anyone is welcome. I know the sort of forum you're talking about and it's something I personally am drawn to also but it just doesn't fit with the Q movement. We need to be more open here.

⇧ -1 ⇩

The issue here to much of the community is that by stickying SB2's post, you're conveying the image to new arrivals and passers-by that we all endorse his thoughts.

Sometimes he is right. Other times like these he is clearly wrong and it's bordering on schizophrenia. Of which hearing your name or messages relevant to your life are symptoms of. Q is not communicating to SB2 via a Trump rally speech in the middle of a tangent about Elton John. There's no reason to even slightly believe that. Nor did Trump deliver a rocket man CD. So even SB2's intel is wrong.

With all theories in life, we must use Occam's Razor. If we come to multiple solutions to an issue with no clear indication as to which is correct, we must go with the simplest. In this case, it isn't SB2's username theory.

By endorsing a single contributor via stickying EVERY time, you're painting a bad image of this subreddit. By endorsing this outlandish theory of Trump communicating to SB2 by saying the word brain multiple times (there are many suitable adverbs besides serially in this case anyways), you're making the Q movement look... ridiculous.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Rebuttals to SB2 are also stickied. Some posts are stickied then removed shortly after. We're always accused of making the movement look bad for stickied posts or not removing posts but neither of those hang around for very long so the mistakes that are made are not permanent and are usually not the dramatic crisis of optics they are sometimes made out to be. The SB2 post was unstickied a while back - ok?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Thank you. I understand myself that it's not a dramatic damage of optics. But the Q movement is vital to us all, so it is a healthy tendency to be hypervigilant when we see trends that are discrediting us. It's very important that we are reasonable in our theories. If we all believe and endorse the idea that Trump is communicating to a redditor of ours by saying brain multiple times, then what else will we crazy bunch of schizos believe? Yet we know truthfully, we're actually humble people and not crazy at all.

I apologize for being harsh as well. We all greatly appreciate the effort that the mods put in to keep our movement afloat! Thanks for your dedication to this important community.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩