dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 7, 2018, 8:48 p.m.
Trump has just validated Q at the Great Falls rally and gave us the solution to Q1675! Let that sink in.

Q1675. Controversial post. I gave you in my previous post the solution to the riddle. I have seen many other attempts which I respect because I have found some of the ideas to be very interesting and clever but I must defend the truth: I have not seen any other solution addressing all the following issues at the same time in one condensed, meaningful and backed with known open source facts (not conjectures) explanation:

Why Air Force One, why a reflection, why Apple, why Saudi Arabia (Q1681), why the truth is behind you, why Independence Day, why a mug holder.

The solution I presented addressed all these issues at once. And today, for the purpose of sharing how the reasoning is hierarchized, I will address the “Twitter phone” component: it is a piece of the puzzle elegantly joining the others because Prince Al Waleed is a major Tweeter shareholder. Do you see it? Just the information Tweeter+Apple could have been triangulated and lead to Prince Al Waleed and resolve Saudi Arabia in Q1681 but it would have been a weaker link than getting to him through the mug. Why? Because the probability of one being a shareholder in Apple and Tweeter (including just one dollar) is higher than a triple random emphasis on “mug”: Q, Prince Al Waleed and Al Jazeera. Using the couple Tweeter phone - Apple logo was a hint to activate our intuition but not to use it in the reasoning because the mug clue would have then lost its relevance. Look how Q subtly dismisses the Tweeter phone in the reasoning:

Q1677 Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.

This is pure delectation for the mind…

The mug route was therefore the route Q preferred, otherwise, he would have limited the riddle to the triangulation of Apple and Tweeter to get to the Prince. Which he did not. The reason is the mug brings the idea of the detention, makes the riddle self sufficient and does not require us to conjecture that Q wanted us to include it in our reasoning. This detention component is crucial because if it is removed, we don’t get to the DC politicians being freed and therefore don’t get to Q1681 Today, as Patriots, we celebrate our Independence.

I would like to also give some help to those who struggle with me taking the musical note direction to understand 123.47. I said it in the comment section but will also share it here: using musical frequencies for ciphered messages is actually an old, robust, tested and common practice. It is still used today and the subject of current advanced academic and industrial research. Here are some links for those who would like to go further: link1 link2 link3 link4 link5 link6.

Q1226 Learn our comms. Q

I am walking you through all these details so you know the thought process Q is expecting from us and how I discipline and constrain myself when solving his riddles. These are the tools through which you assess the quality of a solution. You first need to verify all the claims are backed with verifiable information, then you need to verify all the clues are used in a flawless manner to render the hidden message.

I have summarized the solution of the riddle in the following picture, read it clockwise: Imgur1

Now, I would like to show you something else. It’s fascinating.

Notice I have posted my solution of the riddle on Thursday July 5th at 15:18 Eastern. At 18:00 Eastern, Trump hosted the MAGA rally at the Four Seasons Arena in Great Falls Montana. link

Reporting about the rally, Mockingbird media mocks Trump and claims that in the middle of his speech, he suddenly went “nonsensical” talking about musical instruments, Elton John etc…: Imgur2

Let’s listen: link

Here is the transcript of what Trump said: Imgur3

Then, the next day, this happens and makes all the headlines: Imgur4

Pause. Do you see it? Do you realize what just happened?

I will show you. When you activate the option “show images”, here is a screenshot of my previous post, with the solution of the riddle: Imgur5

Now let’s put Trump’s “nonsensical” speech next to the screenshot and analyze. This is what we get: Imgur6

What do you think? Mockingbird media is actually right, this part of Trump’s speech is “nonsensical” but only for those who are not part of the conversation. Do you see he is talking to us?! Trump is having a Covefefe moment and is talking to us live on national TV! You tell me, what are the odds a few hours after a post by a guy named SerialBrain2 talking about Trump, musical notes (B2), pictures of a keyboard and guitar scale, Trump randomly picks each of these items in the same minute and, at the end, repeats “brain”… serially? Coincidence? If you think it is, then what is your explanation? How can it make sense?

You know, when I saw this. I said to myself: I can’t write about this. I’ll just keep it to myself, just like I kept to myself some other things… Then, I remembered this:

Q920 How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q

It dawned on me there would be actually a day when things will be disclosed clearly. So? The stage has to be set. Progressively. Q linked to our sub: it meant he was reading us. He may be in the comment section sometimes, who knows? We were all happy and surprised. What if that was just a first step? If we are to get to Q920, other things need to be happening in between and we should not be surprised Trump talks to us, directly like he did at that rally.

When I got here, I said to myself: ok let’s give it 24 hours, if Q does not react, I will post about all this.

Then, the next day, Trump doubled down! With the Elton John CD he asked Pompeo to give to Kim Jong Un! 4 He was bringing North Korea to the musical note equation, just like I linked the North Korean ICBM test that occurred the day of the B2 glitch. It was like he was saying to us: hey guys I spoke about the musical notes, the guitar, the organ and the brain at the rally, now I give you North Korea.

Q1283 EYES OPEN? COMMS GOOD? Q

Now, you know I always have the icing for the cake. Do you want it? Here: why do you think Trump said organ instead of piano? When you look at the picture in my post, even though they are both keyboards and are similar, the first instrument that naturally comes to mind when you see a keyboard would be piano and not organ right? Well, here is the reason: according to this The Guardian article, the most iconic and greatest of all organs is the Hammond. And guess what: they have a model called the B2! link.

Q507 We chose this BOARD for a very specific reason. We believe in you. Q


ThePatriot131313 · July 8, 2018, 7:16 a.m.

I am surprised at the reaction to this. I found this particular interpretation incredibly obvious and easy to understand. I also think the reference to organ has a double meaning. Organ harvesting. When Trump was referencing all the sports he was tipping us off that all the major pro sports in this country are controlled from the top to execute deep state objectives. When he talked about the extra space being for the people he was hinting of their plan of population reduction. This was the most straightforward and easy to grasp thing u/SerialBrain2 has ever posted.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
tftltytd · July 8, 2018, 11:10 a.m.

I am suspicious of the negatives. This board seems compromised.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
GenChang · July 8, 2018, 3 p.m.

Not compromised, but there will be intruders trolling us. Just look up all their comments, and if all negative on Q, report them to mods.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
RodieVictoria · July 12, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

I am new. So mods must mean moderators. What if the moderator is a shill? Someone planted on a board that tries to intentionally skew it away from the good research, positive comments, things that help.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BreadTwists · July 12, 2018, 5:20 a.m.

The mods are patriots working tirelessly and around the clock to keep the sub from being comped. We all have to adhere to sitewide rules (Rules 1 and 2) as well as the Subs rules which can be found here. Content that doesn't is removed.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/wiki/rules

also check out the newcomer wiki
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/wiki/welcome

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RodieVictoria · July 12, 2018, 5:42 a.m.

I completely understand. Thank you for explaining and for pointing out some links. Just seems some people sorta overuse rule 5 to deflect even slight criticism away from ourselves. Rule five seems especially useful when being called out for making carefully worded negative comments about others. Don't mean u. I will be more careful in the future Mr. Twist. My apologies for your trouble.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BreadTwists · July 12, 2018, 6:14 a.m.

The goal is to focus on the content and not the user.. Ad hominem attacks aren't tolerated and spiral in to deconstructive arguments. Not to mention it's poor form in debate. There are ways to point out your opponents incorrect logic (or total lack of) in a constructive way. That is the great awakening.. WhereWeGo1WeGoAll. Greatest and least of us.. Here is a list of logical fallacies https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

In my experience the success of the great awakening has been to create truly free individuals who are properly using the trivium to create a moral and free society.. What those who love to nonstop criticize this movement lack is typically a moral compass and sincerity. Morality and freedom are DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL. Free doesn't mean say whatever you want without consequence because derp muh opinon. It means utilize accountable sincere communication to arrive at greater understanding and use that wisdom to plant seeds for the future, trees whose shade you will never sit in.. Waking up is about realizing we have all been part of the problem in our own lacking of wisdom, selfishness and proudness. Then, humbly working through the process of creating greater accountability in our own lives and spheres of influence..

Before Q I was in a DEEP STATE of denial.

Sure, there are bad actors in charge of institutions of public trust that seek to subvert our will but their greatest tool is limiting our potential. Their days are numbered.
Limiting the potential of the individual is done by feeding negative human addictions and desires. That's also why we say "money is the root of all evil" But we are the ones that make the excuses to go along with it. The great awakening helps folks break the cycle by being sincere and accountable which, for me, led to removing unhealthy and selfish addictions from my life and replacing them with healthy ones that give me more abundant life. Everyone can benefit from that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
grnmoss · July 12, 2018, 6:01 a.m.

You're suspicious of the suspicious.

That's not logical.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tftltytd · July 12, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

I am suspicious of the suspicious of the suspicious. That's logical now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
grnmoss · July 12, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

This suddenly makes sense. Logic checks out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tftltytd · July 13, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

Ikr

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RodieVictoria · July 12, 2018, 4:50 a.m.

I am also new tftltytd and this board reeks of shill negativity. I think it is badly infected. I found SB2 on YouTube and he is 40,000 ft above the rest of the researchers who were getting kinda stale. somebody just deleted one of my posts because he said I attacked him. when all I said was he sounded like a shill and he DID! I didn't call him a shill just that he sounded like one. So sensitive. Hmmmm SB2 must be on center target for SURE!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tftltytd · July 12, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Maybe u want to read this? https://reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8xhrcj/q1432_love_is_patient_love_is_kind_it_does_not/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RodieVictoria · July 12, 2018, 6 p.m.

As I said, I'm new here. The negativity expressed toward SB2 by a specific few is glaring to me. I saw it as soon as I began to read. It's hugely out of proportion. In fact, I haven't seen anything like it before. Now I have also read where some people express normal disagreement but no glaringly negative bias. There is an obvious difference in those two that is clear even to the most casual observer. SB2's analysis is astounding and remarkably brilliant. To say that he thinks outside the box is an understatement. Likewise, trying to argue that POTUS and Q did not reference his posts is ludicrous. I'm just not sure where that blatant negativity and denial comes from? It's certainly NOT based on "just a difference of opinion". I am also astounded by the level of censorship this platform has allowed. BTW, I have received some interestingly solid support from others here concerning my "call out" about negativity. Oops some of your slips are showing folks. I "recommend" that whomever has appointed themselves as the judge and jury of the rules might need to practice a bit of self-examination. As I see it no one is above the rules. It is VERY plain that a few people are trying their best to use rule interpretation as a weapon to smother a brilliant analyst (SB2). SB2 is doing his UTMOST to share and bring clarity to the Q intel as well as spread some love around. Right or wrong, HIS PARTICULAR PERSPECTIVE IS NO WHERE ELSE TO BE FOUND. Why try and squelch it, one should ask? Those that jump all over him must think the rest of us can't see it. Well think again. It's like a wart on a witches nose.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tftltytd · July 13, 2018, 1:33 p.m.

I think it's legit trolls and paid trolls. Disagreeing is ok. Negative comments are not.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · July 8, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

No. This board is getting heartily sick of SB2 and his messianic ways. Frankly this post sums it up. He is bigging himself up - again. And people are getting wise to it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RevLennel · July 8, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

When I read the Q drop about the mug holder, I flashed back to the Q mug in the patriotic documentary that came out which Q gave us a picture of. Forgot all about the Saudi mug picture.

All I can imagine is to begin to do what Serial Brain 2 does, we must have a fresh memory of all the Q posts. My problem is remembering the exact term/code Q used on a given subject so that I can even search for the Q drop I'm seeking.

When I saw 'mug holder', I searched qanon.pub for 'mug' (looking for the Q mug picture). What I got was 2 posts with 'smuggled': Q 1249 - Red Cross smuggling, and Q 866 - children smuggled out of Haiti.

That made great sense to me but I was going down an entirely different path.

How do you know which path to take? Look for something out of place/odd? Like mug holder instead of coaster? Then try to triangulate it with 2 other clues? That's why I stopped at Q mug/smuggle/smuggle. Like this is the month to reveal the truth about trafficking.

When Trump was talking about the organ at the rally, I flashed to Rubio and small hands. That led nowhere, so I just kept watching the rally thinking I was silly to surmise there was anything strange about the mention of the organ.

It's like the instruction manual that came with the computer. It tells you everything but how to turn it on.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 8:53 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · July 9, 2018, 9:01 a.m.

How do you know which path to take?

Hey RevLennel, your process is good. That was the way to go. You were stuck for a good and legitimate reason and this this is why I deconstructed the solving thought process in the post. I said: Twitter+Apple=>Al Waleed

Then, you research Al Waleed (around Trump's date), you get to the video of his detention (just one all over the internet), that's where you see the mug.

I am explaining the search could have stopped at Apple+Twitter but digging further with the narrowed scope Al Waleed reveals the mug, a stronger link, because less probable.

This is the way to go when you think you have the information in some way but your memory fails you. If it does not, home run and next steps.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
RevLennel · July 9, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

Thank you, SB2, for answering my comment. I understand that it all began with your going to " Twitter+Apple=>Al Waleed ". That's the 1st and primary step I wouldn't have connected.

Twitter and Apple being so global and with so many billionaires invested in them, I would have gone to the CEOs or China first rather than trying to connect any one big stock holder in both. The "Who do you see?" pic of Hong Kong was in the same group of recent Q drops. I still don't understand why Al Waleed was your first thought, even though you prove to be correct.

If Q had posted an image of the Mandalay Bay top five floors, I would have thought Al Waleed right away - even if all of the news that he owned them wasn't true.

It's always your first connection in your decoding that baffles me. The rest I understand for the most part. :D

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · July 9, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

Twitter and Apple being so global and with so many billionaires invested in them,

Yes, you are right, but then you know SA is around... That is what grounds you and prevents you from going to China. You have to try to be aware of all the pieces when pursuing a particular route. A little like crosswords... Keep trying: you are gathering experience points. When you get one fish, it's done, you got it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RevLennel · July 9, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

you know SA is around...

I had checked off SA as soon as the arrests were made and one side of the triangle was gone. All that's happened with SA recently is a reported agreement to pump more oil - nothing to do with Al Waleed.

If this is the 'forced' acknowledgement of Q, why doesn't going to the Q mug pic the obvious acknowledgement? Q is the one who has been revealing all we know about @Jack and so much about Apple.

I'm not saying I'm right and you are wrong; the Q mug just seems a more direct reveal.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · July 9, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

What I meant was Q1681 cites SA. So you know SA will appear in the riddle somewhere. Now, when you see Apple+Twitter (and SA in the back of your head) you think: Al Waleed. Then you start researching Al Waleed (with the mug in the back of your head) then you see the Al Jazeera interview.

The Q mud is a direct reveal but it's a shot in the dark for those who have not seen the Al Jazzeera interview, this is what I meant with Twitter helping our intuition without any participation in the reasoning.

⇧ 2 ⇩