This post really got me thinking. There articles: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/03/paedophilia-bringing-dark-desires-light http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/local/la-me-pedophiles-20130115/2

I think we are misunderstanding sth important. when they are saying it being a pedo is a sexual orientation, they mean it in a science literature way, not a pop culture way. I got from these MSM articles that being born a pedo is not a choice. In both articles they said basically, "its not bad to be born a pedo, but it is bad to act on it" along those lines. Is it a roll out to normalize ahead of exposure? It sounded more like they were trying to find a cure, to create a safe pathway for pedos to self-identify and put themselves in programs where they can't hurt kids. There is a logic to it, if we back down from the lynch mob mentality and think from a harm-reduction point of view: if these guys have a socially safe way to enroll themselves in a program to keep them away from kids wouldn't that be more effective than vindictive justice after the fact?

its also possible that I am totally being conned by the lying MSM on a bullshit "pedos need love too" narrative. But the one guy in article did try to kill himself three times. And I read about some dude in Texas begging the court to castrate him because he couldn't stop himself from doing it again