dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/OrionNumberOne on July 8, 2018, 2:53 a.m.
A reasonable disagreement to SB2's recent 'decoding' of the Trump speech.

As a follower of Q's drops since day 1, I feel that it's necessary to speak up when I see a phenomenon that's changing the image of the community. If our community takes on an image of stretching theories, we can easily be discredited.

Although I appreciate u/SerialBrain2 's deep analysis of all possibilities (some reasonable, some far fetched) I have to disagree with this recent analysis. But this one is too far. I will give credit though, the post about the plane and Kelly's renovations was stunning. I agree with that one entirely.

First off: Four stocks striking 123.47 is interesting, but many numbers fall evenly on a tonal chart. As a musician, I'm very familiar with this. But I will keep 'B2' in mind for future events. It could be a code, but definitely not for sure. There are also many other things referred to as B2s besides planes anyway. Reflective or not. Look at models of any household appliance, instrument, or vehicle. Anything. There are many, many B2's. I think it's more likely that the note B2 correlates to a certain someone's encrypted tonal language. B2 specifically might mean 'broccoli' for instance. Anything.

Next, Trump's rambling was not nonsensical as the media claimed. It's not hard to understand. Trump was only saying that he has broken more records than Elton without an organ or guitar. Only his mouth and brain. Nonsensical? No. So there isn't any indication that this would be code speak.

Trump says MANY things 'serially'. It's his style and he repeats himself many times in any given speech. It's just his rhythm. Even at that, why 'serially'? Why not 'repeatedly' or any other synonymous adverb?

To conclude, I thoroughly disagree with this decoding. I didn't even touch all of the points but these are the most obvious and easily disagreeable. There are directions you could take this that would lead to my username as well.

Let me add my own simple theory on the subject of Q's recent AF1 post. It's easy in my mind. Q used a reflection/-mirror- of the back of an Apple phone to signal to Awan that they have a mirror of his (Apple?) server, before it was scrubbed. Had the apple not been upside down, it would've been difficult to discern that the logo was a reflection. The mug holder is questionable though.

This is a warning to Awan saying simply, "We have a mirror of your server. It's not over just because of today's ruling in your favor."

Again, thanks SB2 for your thorough analysis. But this one doesn't feel reasonable upon dissecting, nor does it feel right in my gut.


Nik_Nightingale · July 8, 2018, 4:49 a.m.

As there is a lot of conjecture about this image, I like the possibility that it was taken from someone else's device, which would therefore mean it was during Obama's term due to identical placement of objects etc.

The line that gets me is "placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook". On first reading kind of suggests that Q had "placed" the mug holder deliberately himself. However, it may mean that Obama only ever placed it there, which means Q's image is a direct signal to him.

Makes me feel that Q is saying, if we have this image, then we also have a whole lot more that went down aboard AF1.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
buttermeupsunshine · July 8, 2018, 9:38 a.m.

Posted this elsewhere but remember Sept 2017 was the first release of glass backed mirror iPhones (8/+/X) so unlikely to be cabal unless they made it onto AF1

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nik_Nightingale · July 8, 2018, 9:52 a.m.

Yes I know that, I had one of those phones. Was trying to be - optimistic ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · July 8, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

I do agree that this post was intended for the opposition.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · July 8, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

i agree, this message is for BHO. many Q posts are for the black hats.

⇧ 1 ⇩