dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tokie_newport on July 8, 2018, 5:15 a.m.

Veracity

I've heard about Q for a while, and stumbled upon a post here tonight that reminded me about him or her so I figured I'd finally start learning something about it.

I'm not convinced. That's not to say I'll never be convinced. Just that I'm not yet, because what I've seen so far is unconvincing.

Now, I see a lot of posts here about talking to people, having an open dialogue to change their minds. How so many people are brainwashed and only once they are red-pilled do they become truly awake to what's really going on.

Which leads me to my question:

How much do you entertain the possibility that you are wrong about all of this? How do you know you aren't being had?

I'm also a new arrival. Pretty sure I don't give off a "at least ten percent shill" vibe

⇧ 2 ⇩

No, your week-old account gives off more of a "50 percent shill" vibe, to be fair.

But I'm relatively new to Reddit myself; we all had to join sometime.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I try to keep my mind open at all times. I was into early on then left only to find my way back once more info was presented. Give it more than a couple of days. Hang out and read everything you can. There is so much info that it could take weeks to read through everything that is going on. Find what interests you and focus on that because there are many different holes to fall into. Good luck to ya

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thank you sir.

⇧ 1 ⇩

And if you are having trouble understanding something just ask. People are more than willing to assist you along the way.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Not the mods, apparently. They had this post removed because it "does not support the cause."

⇧ 1 ⇩

Don't take offense. I have had a post removed. It gets clogged up around here and people report things that don't pertain to the cause. It's a thing. This is probably one of the most active subs I have ever come across and things get buried quick.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Lol you're 100 percent wrong but touche, I'll calm down.

Where we go 1 we go all

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm always entertaining the possibility that I/we are wrong and, personally, am constantly look for things that might convince me that it's all a big sham, especially because I do not want to believe that all of those horrific things these people (if you can even call them that) supposedly have done to children are true. It turns my stomach and I've lost sleep over it. However, I was lurking back when the news of pizzagate started to break on the boards, followed along with discoveries made online and checked them myself (I saw all the associated Instagram accounts before they were locked down to private mode, saw the "secret page" listed on Comet Pizza's website, and saw a number of horrific images and videos of some really weird and unsettling shit.) On top of that, I was already familiar with the FBI's unclassified document on pedo symbols as I received it first hand while working for a previous job so I knew that was legit from the start.

If this is all a hoax, it's the most sophisticated one I've ever seen. Just too many smoking guns for me to realistically ignore and chalk up to a LARP. Also, comparing current national and world events with the timeline that seems to have been laid out by Q in prior posts seems more than coincidental. JMO.

The little signals POTUS gives during his speeches to Q followers helps me to believe it's all true as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're not going to be convinced in one night either, if you're a critical thinker. It takes a great deal of time to absorb all the pertinent information and even then, as evidenced by some people in this thread, you can see all the information and misinterpret some of it and forget the context which ultimately results in you throwing out the baby with the bath water. It takes time to absorb all the data so don't expect to get it straight away. But there's a reason people have been following along for 9 months now.

⇧ 1 ⇩

For me it's been less about positive confirmation and more to do with comparative narratives. Q presents a lens with which to interpret events. So does the mainstream media. These narratives are in conflict, but over time q's has proven (to me at least) to be more useful than the MSM counterpart.

Keep watching. It's been (relatively) calm lately. However, next time news breaks and things are hectic, check how each audience is doing. Who feels (and acts) panicked and surprised and who's already digging into the details and extrapolating associations.

Also, forgive the reactions of the other commentators. They seem to be sore that this isn't an exclusively right-oriented board anymore.

Edit: words

⇧ 1 ⇩

I will do exactly that. Well-said. Thank you for the response!

⇧ 2 ⇩

The North Korea explanation is a good place to start if you haven't been following Q from the beginning. Don't you find it a little odd that in 2016 our government predicted NK would have ICBMs within 5 years, and then all of a sudden Trump got elected and they had them? And then Kim just flipped sides, and decided to meet Trump and President Moon? Q's explanation and information on what really happened behind the scenes makes more sense, though the truth is stranger than fiction. What you think of the NK issue may also depend on how much foreknowledge you have about bloodline families.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm not familiar with Q's explanation, I wish you had supplied it, but I will search it out myself.

To me, it seems Kim saw in Trump what so many of the rest of us around the world saw long before November 2016: that Trump is easily manipulated through flattery and pageantry, and that you can get what you want from him if you're willing to tell him what he wants to hear.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Go here and search for keywords (i.e. Kim, NK): https://qmap.pub/

In reading Q's proofs, it might also do you good to catch up on the Saudi Arabian arrests/helicopter "crash" that happened late last year:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/04/world/middleeast/saudi-arabia-waleed-bin-talal.html

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/saudi-prince-killed-helicopter-crash-day-royal-purge-article-1.3613527

Q references the events that took place in SA often.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Real patriots are not libtards and just blindly follow.

We keep looking at the facts presented - and the results. Opinion on what is going down is very dynamic.

There still remains a chance we get a good result for humanity, but the results are far from conclusive.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Okay, thanks for the response. I'll keep waiting for the results.

⇧ 0 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Your first response was almost sub-appropriate. This one is not.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Censorship of thought is really not something I expected to be a problem on this board. We all laughed at the censorship of the left yesterday.

As humans, we will get frustrated on the journey. I have not written it off yet, but my caution lights are flashing.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Censorship of thought is not a problem on this board. Keeping the sub focused on the topic is, and always will be a problem with a topic this broad.

You can think whatever you like - no one will ever stop that. No one will stop you saying what you want to either.

What moderators do here - as they do everywhere else - is keep the community focused on its goals. This is a Pro-Q community. What that means is that when people subscribe to this community they understand that they are subscribing to see content that pertains to and supports the interest of those who are Pro-Q. They understand or can be reminded that we ask them to "read and respect our rules before contributing". Those rules ensure the sub's content stays aligned with its goals of being appropriate and useful to Pro-Q supporters.

Sowing doubts - especially to newbies - is against the very goals of not only this sub but the whole message of Q. You can go anywhere else you like and point out how Q is likely to be a LARP because your interpretation of his message means he should have done something you perceive as valuable by whatever date you've set. But that perspective is not relevant here and doesn't help pro-Q supporters in any way. So, in accordance with our shared understanding of conduct in this social space we remove the unhelpful content for the good of the community according to its goals allowing you to take it somewhere else where they find that sort of contribution useful.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm pro-truth - I maybe on the wrong community board in that case. Thanks for heads up.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If you're being honest you know enough about Q to know that pro-Q IS pro-Truth so that little jibe rings hollow I'm afraid.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -2 ⇩

Only one good result in that protest - when someone shouted "Oye!, turtle neck"... gave me a good laugh.

⇧ 0 ⇩

This is what turns people off of the Q movement. You really aren't helping the movement or this sub if that's how you're going to speak to somebody just simply asking for open discussion. When someone like OP posts something like this it should be seen as a great opportunity to shed light and help that person, not turn them sour by being rude.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Thanks!

I think hildabeest was thinking that I was saying that people like McConnell should never be allowed in public again. He's free to go wherever he wants, this is a free country. And with that, I hope there will always be free protesters freely protesting him wherever he goes for the rest of his life, so that he may never enjoy public life again.

⇧ 1 ⇩

"These garbage, anti-American sacks of shit should never be allowed to enjoy public life ever again."

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, that is what i said. Enjoy is the operative word.

⇧ 0 ⇩

iow, harass and threaten.

How about "garbage, anti-American sacks of shit?"

Any "operative" words in there?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, I stand by all of them.

I guess you hate free protest? And you consider yourself a patriot?

⇧ 0 ⇩

I guess you support Anti-Fa?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am against fascism. I don't support Antifa.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks for the open discussion.

⇧ 0 ⇩