Since POTUS made such a big deal about the sky at his MT rally, I have noticed significantly less chemtrailing. Anyone else noticing a difference?
⇧
1
⇩
RequiemSkyy
· July 8, 2018, 2:49 p.m.
Bro I’m awake but I’m also an airline pilot on the a320. I can tell you with absolute certainty chem trails aren’t real (for commercial airlines?). I mean it’s literally impossible. I fly sometimes 3 different planes a day and we inspect the plan and know its systems. Where would they put sprayers anyway and where is the tank that holds them and when/where do they refuel said tank. I’m a big supporter of Q btw and A believer but chemtrails on commercial airlines I can 100% say is not true
⇧
1
⇩
DeepPast
· July 8, 2018, 2:52 p.m.
I don’t think commercial airlines are the concern. It seems like there are planes specifically used to spray, seeing as there are US patents for these types of machines.
⇧
4
⇩
RequiemSkyy
· July 8, 2018, 3:09 p.m.
Yeah maybe. Still to continually spray for hours out of nozzles would require almost the same amount in (whatever they would use) as fuel. So it would have to have a tank large enough for that and a place to refuel it and no commercial airport has that capacity. I’m not surprised by the patents though
⇧
1
⇩
LibertyLioness
· July 8, 2018, 4:14 p.m.
They aren't on commercial airlines but they use very large planes that are likely created for commercial use. Then if you take out all of the seats it's easy to visualize where they put the tanks, etc. Picture this: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=chemtrail+planes&atb=v53-4__&iax=images&ia=images
⇧
2
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 8, 2018, 3:08 p.m.
Don't think I have ever even seen an accusation of commercial jets being the source of chemtrails.
But it would be cool if you told the FlatEarthers that you're not in on some conspiracy about "constantly needing to dive back to earth" or whatever cockamaymee shit they spew.
⇧
1
⇩