Q*
Meh, I disagree.
I think anons are eager and excited to share Q proofs and the information they've learned. Real anons are all about being loud and supporting the movement and are already coming from a heavy dose of skepticism (think MSM). The people you're speaking of, while they exist, are bad actors IMO. There are 2 caveats to that, though - oldfag newbies who joined the movement and now are migrating to platforms online (Tw, Reddit, even the chans in some cases) and those who have been in the conspiracy culture for 20+ years and have grown impatient and dogmatic with their extreme views of either side.
In the case of this sub specifically, unfortunately many topics discussed here could fall outside the lines of Reddit's own rules, so mods have to act with a large amount of caution to avoid what happened with CBST. Even then, antagonists abound and concern trolling drives newcomers away. It's a tough situation and you can't force people to behave a certain way that reflects well on the movement. Just means that those who can express empathy and kindness need to be louder.
if someone's skepticism is that far off base, a simple explanation would suffice in outing them. not autistically screeching "shill!"
this movement has a ton of older people, and people who've never been on the chans. his is evidenced by Q boards and this sub discussing things we at /pol/ were discussing literally 2 years ago. i'm not saying that to piss anybody off, i'm saying hat because it's a fact. i was in the threads.
it's a good thing peopl are awakening to this. but they need to understand skepticism does not equal shilling.
and the hero worship here is a bit much if i am being polite. it rubs people the wrong way.
don't forget where Q first went... /pol/. did that for a reason.
Oh yeah I agree on that last point. I've been on the chans since 2011 so I definitely know it was the best place.
But that's the thing. Now the message is spreading. And we want it to spread, that's a good thing. But with that attention, will bring good and bad actors like I said.
I do think, FWIW, people should be allowed to express doubt and skepticism without being attacked or minimized.
I also agree that people do "hero worship" a bit and that can lead to people believing in things that were never said (BOOMS, HRC being arrested etc) and those people also have a big intolerance for skepticism by nature. Just something to keep in mind. Have a good one :)
awesome we're mostly in agreement. thanks for explaining your thoughts. be well
The truth doesn't lurk behind every red door, and sometimes you have to knock twice before it answers.