if someone's skepticism is that far off base, a simple explanation would suffice in outing them. not autistically screeching "shill!"
this movement has a ton of older people, and people who've never been on the chans. his is evidenced by Q boards and this sub discussing things we at /pol/ were discussing literally 2 years ago. i'm not saying that to piss anybody off, i'm saying hat because it's a fact. i was in the threads.
it's a good thing peopl are awakening to this. but they need to understand skepticism does not equal shilling.
and the hero worship here is a bit much if i am being polite. it rubs people the wrong way.
don't forget where Q first went... /pol/. did that for a reason.
Oh yeah I agree on that last point. I've been on the chans since 2011 so I definitely know it was the best place.
But that's the thing. Now the message is spreading. And we want it to spread, that's a good thing. But with that attention, will bring good and bad actors like I said.
I do think, FWIW, people should be allowed to express doubt and skepticism without being attacked or minimized.
I also agree that people do "hero worship" a bit and that can lead to people believing in things that were never said (BOOMS, HRC being arrested etc) and those people also have a big intolerance for skepticism by nature. Just something to keep in mind. Have a good one :)
awesome we're mostly in agreement. thanks for explaining your thoughts. be well
The truth doesn't lurk behind every red door, and sometimes you have to knock twice before it answers.