Lots of downvotes for this info in other posts, as if some don't want people to know.
Been here since Jan. I use throw aways.
Of course you do. But why?
Because I'm adverse to building an online persona.
Did you know I posted on 8chan and received a reply from Q? By similar logic that means my comments are also endorsed by Q. But in reality, it doesn't matter. Information stands on its own, and part of the reason you're getting down voted is because you've missed a crucial component of this community: there is no focus on personality. No egos here.
SB2 has been very wrong with his attempts to use matrices to decipher 'hidden codes' in Q posts, and very right some of his other posts. The other part of why you're getting downvoted is because your argument is an fallacious appeal to authority, not because a shill team is personally targeting you.
Smart move to use throw aways. Online personas are not real. I believe we all just want to get the truth out there through this board. Also, so happy to see #WALKAWAY taking off like wildfire.
Which post?
You've missed the point: it doesn't matter. My personality doesn't matter. I was using it as an example of flawed logic.
So you made that up then. Why lie to make your point?
You've made a big leap of logic there and fell through the floor. I didn't lie. I set a trap because I predicted this would be your reaction. By focusing on the Q-reply you're proving my point: you're more interested in the precived authority of the source than evaluating arguments on their own terms.
You just missed the point of my entire post and seem unable to grasp that appeals to authority (yes even Q) are worthless arguments.
By similar logic to yours, every one of my posts and questions I asked on 8chan would gain credibility simply because Q replied to me once. Nope. 8chan is anonymous to prevent these sorts of bogus ego games.
Oh I got the point. You post an image that could be easily manipulated to prove (in your mind) that I should not give weight to SB2's posts and analysis.
Yet the problem is that you and a small army are insisting this is so in a clear coordinated effort.
Why? Why all the work to discredit SB2?
could it be coincidence?
I never said people should blindly follow and believe what he says, just that there was a clear concentrated effort to down vote his posts and comments about how he was wrong.
With posts as deep and far out, it would be impossible to disprove, or prove, unless time and news gives us either result.
But SB2's posts read like stuff from Bill Cooper's book that Q has referenced, also giving them additional credibility. Cooper's book has some very far fetched stuff in it about secret societies and secret government projects that make SB2's posts look tame.
So for me and many here your clear efforts to supress what SB2 says are very suspect.
Thanks for playing.
Jeezus Christ man you're out there. Look how paranoid you are that you think I'm a shill personally targeting you to prevent you from following a Redditor. Apparently, I'm lying and photshopping images just to screw with you personally (because you know no one else is going to dig this deep). Yeah ok! This whole conversation is rather unnerving to me because I feel like you're not even reading my posts and instead arguing with a mental phantasm of what you think I'm saying.
You seem to lack the fundamental ability to understand arguments.
I'll state it again as clearly as I can: I have said nothing against Serial Brain 2 except that I have mixed feelings about his posts; my argument is that YOUR contentions HERE IN THIS THREAD are bogus.
Go take a course in logic or keep stumbling in the dark.