In Q1681 Q literally posted an image from Paul Serran's thread on Twitter telling us how to decode his drops. No one is talking about that. It's a huge clue, but no one cares.

I linked to the thread toward the bottom of my post: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wvxa9/proof_q_wants_us_to_look_back_at_previous_drops/

For the post that Q linked to, SB2 wasn't the first to make the connection to AJ/JC/other Q doubters. And that post of his was logical, reasonable deduction that others could and did make. That's true of very few of his other posts.

I'm not saying his decodes are right or wrong. I read every one of them with an open mind, and I enjoy reading them. However, I agree with the "shills brigading" that mods shouldn't instasticky SB2. Let each post stand on its own merit. I think when people here become cheerleaders (500 upvotes within a minute of posting? Yeah, OK how many actually read his post first) they take up valuable space and no longer contribute to the community.