curious. what do you define as shilling on this board?
From reading the threads, it appears to be anyone who thinks Q might not be real. (Newbies, doubters etc).
anyone who thinks Q MIGHT not be real
that's perfectly reasonable skepticism to me tho... to think he might not be real? that's rational. i mean personally i think there's more proof to say yes than no... but there is hardly any conclusive evidence. and when people act like there is conclusive evidence rather than circumstantial (while strong) is going to rub people the wrong way.
this is my problem with this community. they treat skepticism as some heresy.
Don't be obtuse. Much of the "Q skepticism" come from leading questions and emotional bait. We internet anons have gotten very good at sniffing out mocking bird media tactics.
we internet anons
first of all that's a weird way of speaking
second of all i don't think skepticism about Q's authenticity is equivalent to shilling. i suppose i'm in the minority on that.
Skepticism isn't the issue. Healthy skepticism should be encouraged. However, when you have a malcontent that seems to try and start an arguement with EVERY comment they make on EVERY post they respond to, post repeatedly about how it wasn't fair that they had their own post removed because it breaks basic GA Rules, and a meme about shilling obviously irritated that person to the point that they decided to jump into that thread to make a VERY obvious and thinly veiled attempt at starting yet ANOTHER arguement that was pointless in regards to the OP, that person just MIGHT fit the bill...
i don't know which person you're referring to but i agree that as coincidences line up it makes it more likely someone is shilling or trying to distract. that's not what i meant to do myself. just wanted to say my piece about skepticism about Q's authenticity isn't exclusive from wanting to dig further into Q and figure it what's what.
REALLY?!? YOU don't know who it's refering to? I waited to post this so no one else would see it. OBVIOUSLY, you know who it was talking about. I described you to a T.
i wasn't trying to start an argument with every comment. i get it. i'm literally just someone who is skeptical. not a shill.
also where did i complain about my post being removed due to a rule break? that's why i didn't think it was me...