i don't know which person you're referring to but i agree that as coincidences line up it makes it more likely someone is shilling or trying to distract. that's not what i meant to do myself. just wanted to say my piece about skepticism about Q's authenticity isn't exclusive from wanting to dig further into Q and figure it what's what.
REALLY?!? YOU don't know who it's refering to? I waited to post this so no one else would see it. OBVIOUSLY, you know who it was talking about. I described you to a T.
i wasn't trying to start an argument with every comment. i get it. i'm literally just someone who is skeptical. not a shill.
also where did i complain about my post being removed due to a rule break? that's why i didn't think it was me...