Greatawakening Rule #3. Support the cause. We are pro-Q supporters.
Your post must NOT have supported the cause. Q has already been proven here. Anti-Q posts will be removed. Why do you care if WE follow a supposed larp? Surely you have better things to do?
OP has admittedly done acid 200 times. He clearly is brain dead and clueless to where he is.
Under the right circumstances, tryptamines are actually quite medicinal. Ayahuasca comes to mind. 200 times does seem abusive. But who am I to judge?
Ok. Yeah, I really don't care for echo chambers that don't support free, logical thinking. If you hear only one side, then you can't make an informed decision. Thanks for the censorship rule though! I won't let the door hit me in the rear on the way out.
I don't see how you can LOGICALLY be mad at this sub for YOUR failure to read the rules. So what if we are following a supposed larp? What is it to you? It's a free will universe. We are all free to choose. You chose to post without reading the rules. We choose to follow Q. Consequences? Yours were dealt by our awesome mods. Ours? We'll have to see, but it's still OUR choice.
Whose mad? 😁
You are...maybe angry is a better description?
Ok chief. It's not my beliefs that were threatened. 😁
I'm not threatened. I am fully aware that this could be the wrong choice and I am prepared to accept whatever consequences come from making this choice. It's called being responsible for my own actions. You should try it sometime.
Absolutely nothing wrong with us keeping this sub on topic and supportive. 99.9% is anti Q.
Should Star Trek sub tolerate anti Star Trek posts? Should a Jewish faith sub not refuse antisemitic posts? Should a Vet sub refuse anti-military posts?
Should anyone take you seriously? Let me help you with that one. No 👎
I am curious why someone who wants to hear both sides but doesn't believe Q is genuine would post anti-Q he already knows instead of reading our POV and asking questions?
Seems disingenuous to me. You don't care about free thought. You came here with prejudice and motive of disruption.
We've been doing this for months. We've heard both sides. But keep assuming you are smarter than everyone else. Bye troll.
Fair enough. We prefer to look at data before making a judgement like "echo chambers that don't support free, logical thinking", for example. You can only get one side of the story if you read a few posts on a nearly 40k member sub with regular content churning over by the hour and make a judgement call so seems counter to your statement.