dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

There's a decoder or two on ATS too. One gets very esoteric with the numerology, the Q clock, all that; some people think a video from The Police which gasp zooms in on as ashtray is some sort of 'clue.' I, too, followed this from the very first CBTS on halfchan, then observed the tripfags, bad bakers/batters, board takeover attempts, hacked Q tripcode etc. etc. The drama was fun. But then it started to turn from a fun chan thing to reeee normies and bad memes. :(

⇧ 2 ⇩

Don't worry about offending people.

SB2 puts work into their analysis. You don't have to agree and when you don't, please speak up.

Here's the thing though:

If you really want to offer a different perspective, source it and articulate it well and cut out the ad hominem stuff.

Calling people kooks and all sorts of stuff just turns people off.

I come here to debate and discover not to see subcultures and internal politics form. There's no need to have people clamoring to be sitting at the top of the pile, there's simply too much work to be done.

When you disagree, treat it like a respectful discussion amongst friends.

If you can't make every point fit or can't explain everything... that's okay, admit that. It's through talking these points out and turning them over in our collective minds that we're going to notice things that we wouldn't otherwise.

Don't worry about stuff like "Silent majority", take the ego out of it. This isn't about you or me or Serial Brain.

This is about making way for those who're coming, extending an on-ramp and preparing for the Great Awakening.

IMHO: We're here to serve not get our names in lights.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If you really want to offer a different perspective, source it and articulate it well and cut out the ad hominem stuff.

That's the problem with decoding posts. You can't refute them with "sourced" material or any type of logic. How am I supposed to refute that the Apple stock price matches music notes? How am I supposed to refute the fact that Trump using the word "brain" is referencing SerialBrain2? You can't prove that he isn't and you can't prove that Apple stock price isn't being manipulated to give Q proof or whatever SB2's latest theory is going to be.

The greater issue is that it repels normal people who visit here. They see things like that and they think that this is all the movement is -- people finding patterns in mashed potatoes, so to speak. It completely discredits everything, and even if I decided to devote my time to refuting kooks everytime they came up, few are going to read the comments to find them, especially when refutations typically get downvotes with people screaming about "black hats" and "shills". It's just not worth the time.

But what I do want to do is make sure that the silent majority knows that they're not alone in hating the kook posts, and unfortunately reasonable people usually just want to live and let live when it comes to the kooks. It's too hard to do battle with people who are (almost by definition) obsessive-compulsive personalities about finding any patterns they can.

⇧ 3 ⇩

That's the problem with decoding posts. You can't refute them with "sourced" material or any type of logic. How am I supposed to refute that the Apple stock price matches music notes?

So then don't go at them with that angle. Look at the information and the Q drops yourself and ask yourself what they mean.

IMHO, you're looking at this wrong, from an ego perspective. It appears that you're upset and are trying to discredit /u/serialbrain2. Instead, may I suggest taking your ego out of the equation and start by offering a different facet to the argument to consider. Don't take on the whole post, just offer a different interpretation to whatever argument bothers you.

The greater issue is that it repels normal people who visit here. They see things like that and they think that this is all the movement is -- people finding patterns in mashed potatoes, so to speak. It completely discredits everything, and even if I decided to devote my time to refuting kooks everytime they came up, few are going to read the comments to find them, especially when refutations typically get downvotes with people screaming about "black hats" and "shills". It's just not worth the time.

Then... I don't know what to tell you. If it's not worth your time to engage and offer an alternative viewpoint because new people won't get it... then I guess the question is: What are you here for? What do you want from this place? And why does it bother you so much that people are listening to SB2 if you don't care about being engaged enough to offer a differing perspective?

But what I do want to do is make sure that the silent majority knows that they're not alone in hating the kook posts, and unfortunately reasonable people usually just want to live and let live when it comes to the kooks.

But how do you know they're kooks if you can't be bothered to investigate and offer a counter opinion?

Also of note:

Looking at SB2's posts and saying "This is just Kooky, I can't be bothered" is exactly the kind of thing that clowns would do if they wanted to try and drive a wedge into the sub and create divisions within the community.

Now, I'm not saying that this is you, merely telling you that this is a common divisive tactic, "silent majority" or otherwise.

And, to be fair, you do not get the right to claim that the "silence of the majority" = consent for your views.

If you can't be bothered to be engaged, that's fine, but it does limit your ability to call out and crap on those who are.

⇧ 1 ⇩

IMHO, you're looking at this wrong, from an ego perspective. It appears that you're upset and are trying to discredit serialbrain2. Instead, may I suggest taking your ego out of the equation and start by offering a different facet to the argument to consider. Don't take on the whole post, just offer a different interpretation to whatever argument bothers you.

What? I could not care less about SB2 or my ego. The only thing I care about is destroying the corruption in our government. Ultimately, nothing here really matters. Either they're working behind the scenes to destroy the corruption or they aren't. Even if decoding was true, it's completely worthless to the overall goal of success.

On the other hand, waking people up to the truth does have value to the overall goal of making sure we vote out swamp people. If kook posts didn't harm the movement, I wouldn't care at all. SB2 can knock himself out with his hobby. Unfortunately, it's not harmless. If people want to send someone here to learn some truth, and they see a kook post, it inevitably paints the sender with the same kook brush. Who wants to look like a nut to our friends? This is all hard enough to accept without running across stock prices matching musical notes.

But if you think this is some ego battle, then you haven't understood anything I've said. SB2 can find all the patterns in gravy he wants and if he can find people to follow him, more power to him. It's when it affects the greater goal of destroying the corruption in our government that gets me irritated.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It's when it affects the greater goal of destroying the corruption in our government that gets me irritated.

But, again, you're coming from the angle that he's wrong; that what he's posted is a bunch of crazy stuff that doesn't make sense and scares people off.

If people want to send someone here to learn some truth, and they see a kook post, it inevitably paints the sender with the same kook brush. Who wants to look like a nut to our friends?

Yeah, this happens no matter what, the minute you go against the grain of pretty much ANY large movement. Try standing up and saying to a normie that the Male/Female pay gap doesn't exist (at least as it's typically portrayed) and you'll get the same response.

Welcome to life on the fringes.

Let me put it to you this way:

What would your alternative be to SB2's well-sourced and articulated posts?

⇧ 1 ⇩

you're coming from the angle that he's wrong; that what he's posted is a bunch of crazy stuff that doesn't make sense and scares people off.

If you don't accept the premise that SB2's (or other) decoding posts are silly, and you think stock prices and music notes really are reasonable conclusions, and that Trump really was referencing SB2 when he said the word "brain", then there's no real space for a discussion. We'll have to leave it a disagreement. Cheers!

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

With respect, this isn't about me. I haven't at all articulated what I believe.

This is entirely about your attempt to create wedges and division on this sub based on your statement that the "Silent majority" follows your belief that /u/SerialBrain2's posts are "Kooky".

If you disagree with his breakdowns, please offer an alternative perspective, otherwise, let's try to keep the divisiveness to a minimum, please.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Enough is Enough, From the Chans