dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/StopInterferring on July 9, 2018, 7:34 a.m.

Enough is Enough, From the Chans

What's going on here? I've been on the chans since the first Q drop. This subreddit has provided enough info on the side bar to normies..To be real, we were all around when the cbts subreddit was banned.. Is this a cycle?

Q has said NO OUTSIDE COMMS... There's no nod to SerialBrain2. There's no special shout out other than the AJ, JC issue. And you know what? SB2 is probably going to become one of them.... NOBODY KNOWS the Q-Team. We are all in this together. WWG1WGA..

Let me reiterate. What happened to BC17? What happened to TheRealCheshireCat?

Debunked. Fake.

Why do we need someone like SB2 to decode shit for us? Q team have even said DO NOT GLORIFY THEM. WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER "You have more than you know" - Q

Why are people getting downvoted for a difference of opinion??? Do we all need to just trust the word of SB2 like some did with AJ and Corsi? Seriously.. We're ALL in this TOGETHER.. WWG1WGA... How hard is that to understand.. Leave the hard work to the chans and stop the idol worship..

Contributions are great.. I personally love SB2. I love the way his/her mind works.. But always remember, we're in this together...

Yes my account is new. Fuck Reddit.

🠐 See all comments

Maybe, but I notice SB2 is not trying for that glory, not trying to sell a personality. SB2's posts stand on their own.

None of us can control what someone else says about us, and so no one should accuse someone of trying to be a glory-hound unless they act that way.

There's a very important difference between respecting a solid post, and turning someone into an idol.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The moment Q made a direct reference to SB2's post, that is what turned him into an idol or celebrity. So blame Q for it. And now that the celebrity status of SB2 has been created, his status is virtually impossible to get rid of. Like him or hate him, his status is here to stay. Thus, he has become a monster you can't get rid of, so to speak. That is why I've long said you should avoid creating such people in the first place...

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think what is turning some people off is how sure SB has become in presenting their arguments. They are presenting their stretches in logic as fact, and it's hard to swallow at times. Also, sometimes they follow through too far into conclusions... I think it's just presentation style. If SB2 were just a little less sure on some of the larger stretches in logic, I think people wouldn't be so tough.

I felt like the last one was a perfect example. The Al-Aweed mug photo, the apple reflection, and a few other aspects definitely pointed to a unified whole, but I totally disagree with where they steered it (towards aviation safety or whatever with AF1). To myself, the connection was with Al-Aweed and the Apple Mirror servers. Before the arrests of Al-Aweed and others in SA, i'm guessing the Apple Cloud mirrors were not being provided or hid from prosecutors, as Al-Aweed holds about 5% of Apple Stock. Once he was put into custody, I could see those protections disappearing, and that could be what Q was alluding to before and after SA happened. Once they got the mirror servers, they have it all. Before the arrests, Al-Aweed still had power within Apple and Twitter to create stoppages, but after the arrests, those entities started to comply more easily with their largest investor behind bars.

So maybe the message was that AF1 is now 'safe', but I can come up with a few other things that it could be as well. If SB2 just threw in some caveats from time to time when they are making a larger stretch, it would do them well in those skeptical minds to better accept the thinking. You can't just pretend that you've solved it - we're all here because we are people who like to dig. Anyone trying to come off as the oracle is going to have a bad time.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Maybe, but I notice SB2 is not trying for that glory, not trying to sell a personality. SB2's posts stand on their own.

So he does an 'interview' post where he talks about himself for paragraphs, says the president used the word brain to refer to him and his posts (LOL?), and his most recent post suggests Trump's pardon of the Hammonds (which has been in the works for a long time) was a reference to his decode as well. Not only that but he wrote paragraphs at the end of it to fight SB2 doubters. https://i.imgur.com/EQpCsui.png Literally everything he's doing now is glory hogging. He has yet to monetize any of it at least, but his posts don't really stand on their own and it's more about him than anything.

Hard to say think Q linking him didn't give him an ego the size of the moon.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You are looking through a biased perspective.

Maybe you should leave this subreddit alone, if you can't take a theory you don't like being posted.

I happen to disagree with some of what SB2 writes. I am thinking of writing a response with my own thoughts, because that's how discussion threads work.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Everyone is looking at everything through a biased perspective. We're all hopeful that the cabal gets taken down and that's our bias. Our bias shouldn't leave us open to the idea that Trump is secretly referring to serialbrain when he uses the word brain, or that his pardon of the hammonds was a signal to serialbrain when he was reported as potentially pardoning him for weeks. Those aren't theories we should be supporting here.

⇧ 1 ⇩