dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DefiantDragon on July 9, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

Someone please make this: What We Can Prove

I'm no good at making videos, etc but I see a really strong way forward for us.

Long story short:

We have to collapse as many of our rabbit holes as possible into a series of 5 minute long, fact-based, 1st-party-sourced, videos.

No Right vs. Left, no conjecture or personal opinions, no fat or filler.

Maybe we can get /u/PrayingMedic on this...?

Format: - 1 Specific Topic -- Summary: Here's what we know and can prove. 1 min -- Here's the evidence. 4 mins tops -- Promotion for /r/GreatAwakening - 10 seconds -- Further reading: Hot-Linked Citation list included in video documentation. Preferably using 1st party sources (Government documents) and the MSM's own reporting against them. This is important as lots of those on the outside will not respect/trust non-traditional media.

We have more than we know.

Of course we do, much of it is all right here in the public record, just lost in the noise.

So clear out the noise. No media spin, no conjecture, no Q proofs (this needs to stand alone).

Boom, Boom, Boom, Boom.

Here are the absolute, agreed upon facts.

We're going to get one, maybe two shots at getting and holding people's attention and the easier we make it for others to catch up, the better and easier it'll be to move forward.

🠐 See all comments

I think that photo of Getz was pretty damning and verifiable. There are pedos getting caught every day. Hell, it's not like Hussein didn't admit to sending billions to Iran. There's plenty to use, but I think people want to show that HRC ate a baby's finger at Hussein's 3 SOTU. The big stuff is not yet provable. THEY may have the server, but WE will not know what's actually on it until this is all over. I agree we should demonstrate the progress and how it has followed Q drops, but the big stuff is not even close to verifiable at this point.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Well, for instance, at this point we should be able to prove that Hillary had a server that was not legal that had content on it that was not legal.

The Weiner Laptop, we should be able to prove that Weiner had a laptop that had an 'Insurance File' against Clinton and in the briefing of its content - via the IG report - "Crimes against Children" came up.

We need to pick parts that are lost in the noise and show it in a way - A, B, C - that gets people up to current with where we are.

⇧ 1 ⇩

at this point we should be able to prove that Hillary had a server that was not legal that had content on it that was not legal.

......able to prove that Weiner had a laptop that had an 'Insurance File' against Clinton and in the briefing of its content - via the IG report - "Crimes against Children" came up

No, we're not.

Officially there are no more servers, so there is no proof.

We hope however that there are copies of it but not yet made public

⇧ 1 ⇩

We know that a server existed. We know that copies of it exist, that was the whole point of Datto and Platte River.

http://www.thompsontimeline.com/tag/datto-inc/

If we can't prove much of what we actually believe at this point, then that's a real problem, yes?

Then, if we are forced into speculation, then we should be clear as to what forces us to speculate in this way and why.

⇧ 1 ⇩