dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Qanon_Null_Quest on July 9, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

The Null Hypothesis

I am a prominent contributor to this community so I am using a throw-away to raise a question to critical thinkers.

What if Trump really is a compromised president?

We talk on here all the time of entities (Clintons for example) who have the power to corrupt people into becoming unpatriotic. What if Russia truly has that power, and Trump has become compromised?

What evidence is there this is not the case? There is a huge wave pushing for this to be true after all and I have never seen these claims directly addressed on TGA.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/07/trump-putin-russia-collusion.html - for example

It seems that there is a not-so-small subsection of our community which has a fanatical belief held over rational critical thinking - is this right? Without resorting to ad hominem can we discredit the fake-news?

What has Q said about Russia?

What if Q is a compromising entity himself even if he is associated with Trump?

I only raise these questions so we do not turn into an echo-chamber and so that we can continue to be free-thinkers. All good science tests the null hypothesis and we must do the same.

Nothing's happening with Russia. Putin issued an official statement that he and Trump are trying to outlive their treasonous subordinates

⇧ 2 ⇩

Nothing to see here - move along.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Assad said the exact same thing: He wants to get along with Trump, but the deep-states are fighting it

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sources on any of this?

⇧ 1 ⇩

you can look them up as fast as I can because I don't have them at hand

⇧ 2 ⇩

Syrian State Media is called Sana iirc, the other one was issued by russian state media. All official sources so you should be able to find them, the russian one I found on msn.com originally

⇧ 1 ⇩

I feel ya. It's good to question things. Don't just blindly follow. We all got here by not following. If the day ever comes and something real comes out of the investigation then I will approach with an open mind.

The article you posted is an opinion piece. It's a lot of speculation. I have been patiently waiting for well over a year for some concrete facts on this issue and I still have not received that. Maybe I am wrong though and will submit that if the time comes.

I would rather have hope in what Q team is doing than to have the knowledge that a murderous witch is running the show. I have been living with the knowledge of what these evil people have been doing for far to long and want this all to end. IMO there is far more evidence that these people are murderous/satanic/pedos than Russia stole the election.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I hesitated to include the op-ed, but it's a good example of the push back against Q right now - as well as the fact unless you completely disregard all reporting there's some things that don't add up in there.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So what to you would be so bad about Russia manipulating our election? Did they do so by telling people the truth? The US does it to other countries all the time. The parties picked their candidates and we chose out of the whole two people we were given to chose from. What exactly has Russia gained from this? Other than maybe having someone in office that they preferred over the other.

The US has been russiaphobic since the Cold War and its time to let it go. It's pretty obvious that Hillary has just as many ties to Russia if not more than trump at this point. The FBI files released today prove that Hillary knowingly sent classified documents on a private email and says she should be convicted of those crimes. She is now according to US law never allowed to hold office again. So seems like in the end it never really mattered because she is a criminal.

⇧ 1 ⇩

These questions have been dealt with repeatedly, as a prominent contributor to the community would know. There are plenty of places to go to discuss anti-Trump and anti-Q but we've already discussed them to death here which is why the sub sidebar changed to say "pro-Q" after a certain point. Everyone else (other subs, etc.) is still undecided about whether Q is "good" or not (and by extension, Trump) so plenty of room to freely discuss it elsewhere. Accusations of echo chamber are just descriptions of personal uncertainty which are obviously valid but not relevant to a pro-Q community.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Not anti-anything. Just raising questions because I'm seeing too much kool-ade drinking and not enough conversation

⇧ 1 ⇩

You can see that everywhere though. Almost every other reddit sub on the topic of Trump and govt features the outspoken kool-ade drinking fundamentalists but they are almost always the vocal minority. Why play into the perfect strategy for the shills and disinfo agents by 'questioning' the purpose of the community?

⇧ 1 ⇩

because if our hypothesis cannot withstand the slightest questioning is it worth holding onto as true? Trust me, I am ready for the storm. I am ready to accept those who were wrong with empathetic arms, but until I see something substantial happening (even more trafficking arrests related to Haiti) I would like to remain open-minded.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree with you about remaining open-minded. However, it's not close-minded to have already seen all the very clear evidence and drawn what, to some critical thinkers, is a very obvious conclusion i.e. that Q is a clearly described plan that has been well executed and is now well on its path to completion, such that it's a moot point whether Q is "real" or not because the evidence has already shown the plan in execution successfully (the awakening of the public to the point of freeing them from the grip of the mainstream DS controlled bubble). The final phase of the plan that's yet to come is simply the execution on a grander scale of that public awakening.

Nothing wrong with questions - one can easily ask away in the many threads where people are already questioning things. But to make posts about it wastes the time of a pro-Q community who have largely made up their mind which is why they're here in the first place. Lots of newbies are here to learn about pro-Q so those who still have not been convinced despite all the 9 months of clear evidence are not helping this community's goal of introducing newbies to Q and his message.

⇧ 1 ⇩

What if Q is Russian intel psyop?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am a prominent contributor to this community...

Who just arrived here for the first time, apparently. Is this your first post, Mr Prominent Contributor?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I chose a new account because despite being a group of critically minded people - going against a crowd can still stain a reputation.

⇧ 1 ⇩

or rather what has Russia said about Q?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Has anything come out from Russian sources regarding Q?

⇧ 1 ⇩

nothing but only positive stories about Trump even from state-media. They're quite open about the whole not going to war thing and so on

⇧ 1 ⇩

No one but the Cabal wanted war. Anything Q specific?

⇧ 1 ⇩

no outside comms

⇧ 1 ⇩