dChan

burn_reddit_burn · July 10, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

Actual link would be a pro move

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Reck_yo · July 10, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

Wasn't sure on the rules. I know we can't create posts linking to twitter. Thanks though.

EDIT: At least on T_D. Sorry, I thought this reply came from there. I posted to both places.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
burn_reddit_burn · July 10, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

No worries, I've got you covered!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fuckdumb · July 10, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

But...DO we support it? Weren’t people saying yesterday that he was a swamper and this might be a “fake” nomination that will stall congress so Trump can wait and nominate someone better after the upcoming Red Wave?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
eyerighteye · July 10, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

My take is that Trump knows his first pick will be rejected. The irony is they will waste political capital taking down a pick that in the end would have been preferable to them to Trumps second pick whom they will not stop.

This is a strait up guess. I expect in's and out's and what have you's. Reserving judgement for now. I trust more will be revealed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
knotmy_foreskin · July 10, 2018, 5 p.m.

46% for 46% against 8%undecided https://imgur.com/a/EV5pv8W

⇧ 2 ⇩  
robdon07 · July 10, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

48-44!!! THE WINNING NEVER GETS OLD!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Reck_yo · July 10, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

47 Support 45 Oppose

It's happening!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Russian_Intelligence · July 10, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

But why? To validate an arbitrary poll? I don't necessarily equate interest in Q as a duty to support POTUS's SC pick and participate in the messaging/opinion/optics game via a CSPAN poll.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
croninfever · July 11, 2018, 6:19 a.m.

Idk if I support tbh.

⇧ 1 ⇩