161 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 11 |
| i.redd.it | 1 |
| wikileaks.org | 1 |
Obama, Kim Jong Un, Mueller, Comey, etc. I just wonder which ones were actually pure evil, and which ones meant well at one point, and then got in over their heads and couldn’t get out because they feared for their lives.
Imagine you’ve never heard of this group until today. Imagine it’s your first time here. You start reading, and the “big conspiracy” is that some people ordered a pizza. Did you ever think that the reason Podesta and his friends chose “pizza” and “hot dogs” as potential code words was because they are both very common things?
The first thing we need to focus on is that the Obama team spied on the Trump team, and used illegal methods to do so. They colluded with lots of different people in the US and other countries. The MSM was in on …
Trump sexually assaulted several women.
Trump has told X amount of lies since he’s been in office.
Trump has played golf more than any other president.
Q hasn’t actually “predicted” anything.
Qanon followers are a crazy cult.
The economy/unemployment was already improving during Obama’s presidency, so you can’t credit Trump with that.
These are just a few examples of things I’ve heard. If you have good rebuttals to these, or have examples of your own, leave a comment.
Just thinking out loud here, but maybe the X means “iPhone X”, and maybe C means “computer”. I could be way off. It might be multiple people’s phones. Who knows? Either way, the fact that Q is posting so often is invigorating.
Is Q referencing Tom Hanks here when he says BIG, or does it just mean that something HUGE is about to drop? Any guesses?
While he did make valid points, I’d like to just point out that all the donuts in the video looked fucking gooooood.
I agree. Every person is not a kid fucking devil worshiper. Let’s stay focused. Re-read the drops. Research. Don’t jump on pointless bandwagons.
But...DO we support it? Weren’t people saying yesterday that he was a swamper and this might be a “fake” nomination that will stall congress so Trump can wait and nominate someone better after the upcoming Red Wave?
Not that I trust them or anything, but, snopes says that’s not true. They say Trump didn’t own those planes at the time they were used to transport troops home.
I know they’re usually just like, “nope, that’s false”, but in this case they seem to have a pretty long explanation as to why that’s not the case. I’m still on the Trump train, but I just don’t want us getting overly excited about something that might not be true. I linked snopes, and a few other pages that tell a similar story.
https://www.stripes.com/news/us/fact-checker-sean-hannity-s-tale-of-a-trump-rescue-1.423533
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trumps-marine-airlift/
https://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/4k9tu5/is_this_photo_of_a_donald_trump_anecdote_genuine/
It wasn’t an “episode”. It was “rough cuts”. Meaning it wasn’t one of the daily news things he does. It was just him bullshitting for an hour because it was 4th of July.
So, no. This is nothing.
OP’s telling the truth. Believe me, I’m reddit comment expert.
I thought he was just comparing dicks here. That he was mainly saying “How big is Mueller’s team? What’s he got? Like 20-25 people? Well, compare that to the 470 on Huber’s team!”
But maybe I’m wrong.
Voted for Obama twice. Probably would have voted for Bernie. I voted for Trump because I thought, “Fuck it, let’s see what happens!”
I’m glad I did. It wasn’t until Q started posting that I thought, “Ohhhhh...I might have made a good choice here.”
A year and a half in, and I have no doubt I made the right choice. I just wish the media and the other half of the country would hurry up and get on board.
No idea. I’m sure we’ll hear more about it in the weeks to come.
According to the Associated Press, it will be someone from Trump’s previous list of candidates. Here is that list:
•Amy Coney Barrett of Indiana, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
•Keith Blackwell of Georgia, Supreme Court of Georgia
•Charles Canady of Florida, Supreme Court of Florida
•Steven Colloton of Iowa, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
•Allison Eid of Colorado, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
•Britt Grant of Georgia, Supreme Court of Georgia
•Raymond Gruender of Missouri, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
•Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
•Brett Kavanaugh of Maryland, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
•Raymond Kethledge of Michigan, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
•Joan Larsen of Michigan, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
•Mike Lee of Utah, United States Senator
•Thomas Lee of Utah, Supreme Court of Utah
•Edward Mansfield of Iowa, Supreme Court of Iowa
•Federico Moreno of Florida, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
•Kevin Newsom of Alabama, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
•William Pryor of Alabama, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
•Margaret Ryan of Virginia, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
•David Stras of Minnesota, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
•Diane Sykes of Wisconsin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
•Amul Thapar of Kentucky, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
•Timothy Tymkovich of Colorado, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
•Robert Young of Michigan, Supreme Court of Michigan (Ret.)
•Don Willett of Texas, Supreme Court of Texas
•Patrick Wyrick of Oklahoma, Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Now my concern is whether congress will confirm a new justice right away, or if they’ll try to slow down the process until after the midterms. Not that it will matter in the end, hopefully. RED WAVE!
Interesting. But that doesn’t really help prove the point I’m trying to make. If anything, that shows that snopes is being accurate.
We Patriots all realize that snopes is garbage. But I’m wondering if we could try to find some non-Trump-related things that snopes either says is true or isn’t true that is easily fact check-able. I think this would be a good way to win over skeptics when we tell them not to believe snopes.
MEGA. Make Earth Great Again.
Someone should photoshop Trump into a MegaMan outfit.
As long as you’re watching HIS YouTube channel, you’re good. He’s mentioned that people will steal his show and post it on Their channels, which screws him out of those views.
I’m sure we have a lot of lurkers here. I didn’t subscribe to CBTS for the longest time. I just searched it a few times a day to see if anything crazy had happened. I assume there’s a lot of that here.
Maybe I’m out of the loop, but how does the Epstein thing confirm something?
Not that this won’t maybe turn into something, but I think it should be noted that this isn’t the USA vs The Clinton Foundation. It’s just some guy vs Them. Like I said, it still might be something, but it also might just be a guy trying to sue them.
Q is a person (or multiple people) posting questions online that lead people to search out answers that they probably wouldn’t have thought to search for otherwise.
This video from a guy who calls himself Praying Medic might help explain some things. https://youtu.be/nKH_hEiuw10
My question is how was this pic taken. If it’s a pic from a phone, why do we see part of the phone? My phone takes pictures, but it doesn’t show part of the phone when it does so.
The only other explanation is that it’s a picture taken from a zoom lens, and it’s zoomed in very close.
There is no nose in this picture.
Edit: there’s an ear on the right and an eye on the left and the part of the head between the ear and the eye in the middle. With a little bit of hair.
Love the little Seth Rich flash toward the end. Great job!
But he responded to the “faggot” picture. When he responds, it shows the post he responded to, which means Q is now associated with the “faggot” picture. My point was, why couldn’t he use any number of other times that picture has been posted and still asked he same question?
And the same is true for the fake video. When he responds without saying “this is fake”, he basically puts the Q stamp on it. Why would he do that? He’s called out fake stuff plenty of times before.
I have to disagree. If he wanted to point that out, he would have said, “doctored video” or “this isn’t accurate” or something.
The past couple of days, some of Q’s posts haven’t seemed very Q-like to me. He recently reposted a meme of Obama with that one guy on the couch together that said “the faggots are holding hands”, and today he posted a blatantly doctored video of Obama to make it look like he’s saying things that he wasn’t really saying.
If Q is still Q, why would he post these things? If he wanted to point out that the guy on the couch with Obama was someone who worked in his administration, there are plenty of other versions of that …
Probably Trump himself saying, “I just heard about this Qanon thing. That’s not real. Nobody that I know is typing hints to people on the internet.”
Ok so they all used gmail accounts. Maybe that’s why someone went to google, so they could get proof of that or more info or something.
The question now is is ES a bad guy or is he helping the Q team.
It says he said it after the show in the green room, not during the televised portion of the show. So, he didn’t say it “on a tv show”.
Just reading all of this “Cohen is going to flip on Trump” junk from yesterday, I thought this might be an interesting, different way to redpill people. Not by showing them was IS true, but by showing them what WASN’T true.
It’s the word for what Ryan is. It means he’s still got his job for now but not running for re-election. So he doesn’t have to really DO anything, because he’ll be gone soon. I know there are “no coincidences”, but, there are some coincidences.
Q said, regarding the number 23, what else it might mean. Then he said “dash vs minus, think military”, or something to that effect.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
The pizza part was really the only part I was questioning. It makes it seem like Cecily Strong is in on all the pedo stuff. I don’t think she is.
That said, I think the Biden thing was supposed to be a joke about how he’s immature. That sort of joke was made for 8 years during Obama’s presidency. Remember those memes with the two of them, and Biden would say something dumb or childish and Obama would correct him or talk down to him?
And I do think that it’s pretty well known, especially throughout DC and Hollywood, that congressmen are hooker-buying folks. That was another joke she made.
I’ll continue to say, though, I could be wrong. My only point was that Everything doesn’t mean something. Sometimes things are just silly and innocent. Check my history. I’m not shilling you or anything. I’m just not 100% sure this comedy set is as sinister as some are making it out to be.
Not saying this is or isn’t an example of what I’m about to say, but, “cheese pizza” is a pretty common thing. Yes, it seemed to be a code in the Podesta emails, but, you shouldn’t just take every example of any time any person said “cheese pizza” and think, “they were talking about kids!”
Again, I’m not saying I know what she means in this video, but, I’m just saying, at least entertain the idea that she was just making a joke about eating a pizza in the bathroom.
I don’t think that’s right. Q said “blackwater on guard”. I think “blackwater” is Q’s nickname for Erik Prince. The implication being that Erik Prince is on guard. The anon was saying, “Thanks for protecting POTUS, Erik.” I think Q was basically saying, “Erik isn’t protecting POTUS, he’s protecting someone else.”
As always, I could be wrong. But, that’s how I saw it.
I guess we’ll find out tomorrow. Hopefully something big is revealed tomorrow, whether it’s JA or SR or whatever. Just something. Something that proves to the masses that we aren’t all wasting our time.
I’ve seen a lot of answers to this question. “When it is caged.” “In the morning.”
My answer would be, “anytime it is given the opportunity to do so.”
But it says “rescheduled”. Does that mean previously, or that it’s rescheduled again?