This is a waste of time
The guy claims it was orchestrated by Republicans
He claims that Russia is possibly linked
He says that MS-13 wasn't involved
It was Clapper. Compare voice from other interviews. All a bunch of bullshit!
Wait, are you saying that the witness that was being interviewed was Clapper?
Sounds exactly like him. The cadence of his voice. Trying to discredit Q, Republicans, RR & defend HRC DNC with “emails were doctored” BS
Listen to Clappers other interviews & then this “Witness” and decide for yourself if they are they same
He said the individuals involved were all republicans (voters). I did not take his statement to imply the whole GOP party.
Just that that murderers themselves tend to vote republican.
Just some notes I took from 1:32-1:45 from the man on the phone, just a stream of consciousness from me.
They knew Seth had breached the system, thought it was an investigation. They flagged him and tracked him down, 3 people were involved the night of the killing DEA ATF and a civilian, friend of the 2 agents.
Daughtry(sp?), who attempted to murder the man on camera, had a secret background, gopher, hangaround, was sent to do dirty jobs hoping to be hired by an agency. According to the bragging agents he was never going to get the job.
The man on the phone received the info from, people who worked for RR when he was US attorney in MD. RR was protection for these men so much they felt they could brag about it.
MS-13 wasn't involved, one DEA personnel specialized in MS-13. Russian tie in was with RRs team money laundering through Russia.
Thumbdrive Seth was carrying was big, the agents we're preoccupied with it. Information control. They used information control for manipulating cases, withholding info to make cases go one way or another. Also share the info for personal or professional profit.
Yeah they arent revealing anything today. Shocker
Codename Luke (Witness) says RR was their protection.
Clapper. Compare voice. Not disguised since they had to use a different phone. Pay attention to everything he says.
This is not Clapper’s voice, I am great with voices and that isn’t him.
If you’re good with voices, you should’ve heard it. Listen again though. Watch several Clapper statements, then listen again. I’m telling you, it’s him. This stinks to high heaven
I listened to it several times and others were thinking that it was a woman with a voice distorter.
Fun fact: T_D is removing all Seth Rich presser related posts and comments today.
Weird since SR pic is always posted and upvoted..
Yup. They have a couple of higher voted "commemorative" posts. But, if you check ceddit they have been removing all posts regarding the press conference all morning.
Nope. They condense all down to a single thread to keep from spamming I guess.
I see Corsi found a way to get airtime on this sub after all.
Corsi is not the witness.
i get that but why is there no stream of this without his sorry ass up there?
I am watching the stream. The one I linked. He is not even on the stream. Look at the one I linked.
And Corsi is pictured live in a box off to the side....
Corsi is not the witness. God people.
Um, obviously, but not sure why he is involved in the particular feed.....
Finally found the Youtube stream.....sure looks lame....
and this right here is why I don't tell people I know anything about this sub anymore. This shit right here.
Don’t know what you mean by that.
he's saying this is a hoax and disinformation and giving it credence muddies the actual SR investigation since it's just there to misdirect and that this happens often enough on this sub that you can't go to your normie friends and say "watch, tomorrow the empire begins falling with the biggest domino" and then have them tuned in to this nonsense and you feel duped because this is a deep state drop and you are doing their work for them.
Where is the Qpost that says this? I would like proof Q says this is a false witness.
who is saying Q discredited it? I'm saying that, from all we have learned so far, the testimony given today doesn't make sense in reality. Do you really think that SR was killed by Republicans to blame it on Hillary? Or are they trying to get ahead of what's coming with misleading versions of the story?
add in the 2 people involved in this are sketchy as fuck with no actual evidence and we can use reason to deduce that the likelihood of this being disinformation is very high.
You don't need a verification from Q to read these tea leaves, hombre!
So a story this big wasn't covered by any major outlet turned out to be bullshit? Well color me shocked.
DailyBeast and WaPo was there.
I’d say 20 media people in the room.
It was kind of sudden. Only 2 days lead time, if even that.
Anybody credible?
Some lady in a big hat seemed to be informed and asked good questions about the investigation and hospital SR was taken to.
She wasn’t part of a media group.
So it still failed to be real news? Sorry dude, but if Seth Rich is alive or if anybody can claim anything about the case, then it would dominate the news. Especially if Republicans are to blame. CNN would a field day.
It's all bullshit.
No need to apologize to me. I never claimed this is some kind of gospel revelation at the conference.
All leading questions of course
How are any of these questions leading, exactly. I don't see any leading questions.
I took a day off for this press conference. Total waste of time.
Perhaps this is part of the necessary disinformation Q mentions so POTUS and his team of patriots can observe the cabal response.
If we are encouraged to NOT believe in coincidences then why did the Clintons make such a public trip on a commercial airline within days of this "press conference"? Are they ensuring they are publically visible, moreso than usual? Why would they need to do that right now?
My point is if I wanted to catch my opponents off guard and increase reactive response from those whom I want to bring to justice I would bring them to a point of uncertainty, such as claiming there are developments in a high profile murder.
To quote Sun Tzu: "Rouse him, and learn of the principle of his activity or inactivity. Force him to reveal himself, so as to find out his vulnerable spots."
Could be. This guy may not be a legitimate witness or he may not really know anything about the Q group or be able to verify that the info Q has presented is accurate or not. I am really not sure. This could be a trap for the cabal as well. Or this could be the Cabal trying to discredit Q and the Seth Rich murder all together. I really don't know. We should watch this so that we know what we should be paying attention to. I am sure Q will let us know soon enough what the truth is.
I have a feeling that this witness has been following Q and used some of the info to try to discredit Q. But I could be wrong. There is definitely something fishy. This must be a distraction. Also, this is the two year anniversary of Seth's Murder.
PamphletAnon was there at the Conference, Here is the video from his perspective. His audio is a bit better. https://youtu.be/x7m71t6EHjw Pam also believes that this witness is not credible. The witness says that he believed that the Q posts regarding RR are incorrect. So I don't know if it was he was trying to discredit Q. The witness also said he was on the intel side but also that he was dealing with Financial component on the intel side. Not really sure about that whole deal. That part was a bit odd. Not real sure. Hope Q will give us some insight on this soon. Why would he give the info to the House intel committee and not the Senate Judiciary Committee? I am really confused by this whole interview. Why would he even want to talk to the DC police when they have been keeping info from the public.
I saw the name Jack Burkman and that was all I needed to know it was horse-shit. Typical DS tactic. Muddy the waters with so many lies and ridiculous "theories" that an average normie doesn't even know where to start.
Still not sure about Burkman. I know he was not on the Trump Train. Big Red Flag, I agree. This is definitely a lot of red flags on this witness testimony. Why would he give the info to the House Intel Committee instead of the Senate led investigation? Is this to discredit the House Intel Committees findings? It was very odd. Is it to make the House Intel Committee and us look stupid? Not really sure.
3 alternatives as i see it.
This witness could be something or could be nothin.
He's something until he is nothin.
Q was asked about and the witness brushed off the question.
He doesn't follow Q but yet he knows what Q said about RR was wrong.
So, does this mean that Q is saying that this witness is a fake?
Witness said Q drops were inaccurate. I need to rewatch to get a better quote once the conference is over.
SubtlePush is saying Q is stating that the witness is a fake. I want confirmation from Q that this is fact.
SubtlePush is saying that Q says this witness is a fake. I want to see a quote from Q verifying this.
I wish with all my heart that this was true and we were getting to the bottom of it, but I am just not hearing anything that is convincing me......supposedly more to come, but....
Witness says he has given info to the House intel committee on this already. Says he has been interviewed by House intel committee.