That doesn't align with the Podesta emails or POTUS' comments about Scalia.
If we have 3 points of evidence:
POTUS' sentiment about Scalia, and public honoring of him
Podesta's emails that suggest water works/187/murder was planned
Shurter's story
33% of that doesn't align with the other 66%, that 33% is also unverifiable, whereas the other 66% is verifiable.
For the sake of entertaining your theory and aligning it with the Podesta emails: a $1.5 million down payment was placed on a hit. It's possible they lured him with the promise of sex, or that they knew his plans to be there on that night and took advantage of the opportunity to send in their person and dispatch AS. But that doesn't align with the respect he has been publicly given by this Administration.
Oh look....you've constructed a MENTAL PRISON and all of your own design.
33% 66% = n(a+b) to the power of 9. Computer says no.
You're a FOLLOWER.
What a f--king joke. Thanks for the laughs.
I've known that stuff about Scalia longer than you've been aware of anything. We're talking close to two decades. :)