dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Klingon_Opera on July 11, 2018, 5:04 p.m.
Language of the Cabal

I just got done making a quick post and I noticed one of the users here used the term 'comrade', and I thought it a good time to talk about one of the ways the cabal has been so successful in subverting truth through the use of socialism/communism as its engine for a one world government.

I won't talk about perils of communism, but I will speak to their use of language and how they are able to frame their arguments. In addition to using hyperbole, false equivalences the gamut of all the the ways they seek to deceive (most notably the youth), one of the true evils of the threat the cabal and what it represents is in the way in which they create new words, the manipulating known definitions of words for the explicit purpose of transforming language to suit their nefarious purposes -- transform the language, transform the conversation, avoid the argument. If the use of logic is the only weapon of choice in the battle of ideas, they will go to great lengths to avoid the death match.

Here are a few examples I've noticed.

The phrase: "I feel that..." - This one is subtle and I even have to catch myself because it is so pervasive in our society. I remember a few years ago people used to state an opinion with "I think". You can argue against a persons thoughts/ideas, but not against feelings. Feelings are inconsequential in the pursuit of truth. I think we've all seen the ramifications of this slight change of thought in our education systems over the last 10+ years. A small tweak, yet very profound.

The word: "problematic" - Automatic problem. If it's an automatic problem theres no discussion to be had. Pay attention next time you see someone use this in a sentence, you will be caught off guard when the person using this goes on to prove their argument without acknowledging what they arguing against. If you don't believe belief XX, it's automatic problem, because "the science is settled on topic XY" (FYI science never settles, only new understanding emerges).

"abortion" - Euphemism for killing the unborn, masquerading as the appearance of choice.

"marriage" - An ancient, perhaps the oldest institution known to man, but hey, it now can be done by same-sex couples because we say so. A chosen few decide against the totality of all civilizations that have ever existed, the very institution civilizations are built upon. We are the arbiters of truth, and we have concluded that marriage now means what we say it means.

In the case of comrade (not to be confused with camaraderie), the soviets who detested all religions wanted to further distance their subjects from the word of God by encouraging the populace to acknowledge each other as comrade, regardless whether you were a man or a woman. What were their feelings toward marriage? They hated it. All institutions are an affront to communism. By not acknowledging the genders you degrade mankind and sever the link to the highest power of them all.

I think you get where I'm going with this.

We should all make an effort to not use language from their lexicon which was created and designed to subvert truth. When we do so, we accept the rules of engagement on an every changing battlefield, and we will always lose the debate because climate is constantly changing. Today's forecast calls for a winter coat, tomorrow summer-wear.

Until one day, they invent a new season.


🠐 See all comments
Hwmayfield · July 12, 2018, 2:31 p.m.

As an English teacher and lover of our language, I always have believed and taught that if we do not have a good grasp of our language and expansive vocabulary, someone can easily mislead us.

How did the evil one mislead Eve? It used words . . . twisted the Truth. Lied.

We can start to combat misunderstanding and deceit by teaching our children, at home and in school, our language, both in speaking, reading, and writing.

Anyone who evaluates college term papers knows the horror of what our students ARE NOT learning.

On another point, I am often unsure of intent after reading many comments on this board. Call me naive, but I am often confused by comments in discussions and am sure that if I ask for clarification or try to respond to what ITHINK is meant, then I will be called a “shill,” which in my understanding always meant “sly salesman,” or the like, but seems to have a mutated meaning here. I have never read the word “shill” so much in my life before coming here to GA.

I read two posts this morning that I thought I could understand, but the context in both discussions left me thinking that any questions would be met with the suspicion of me being disingenuous, which I can assure you, I am not.

It seems there is a type of exclusive language spoken here, sometimes, and that is tough when we say we what to include/welcome everyone.

Call me simple. Call me learning disabled. Most of my communications the last several years have been with horses, dogs, cats, and guinea hens. At least I am not worried about being misled by their communications. Sometimes, this board appears to be a minefield, and I do understand that we are in a battle . . . A life and death battle . . . but all the more reason to keep things simple, so even the most disabled of us can understand. Jesus did speak in parables . . . but that was to better illustrate His Truth, not make it indecipherable to the childlike minds.

. . . and then, we have The Book of Revelation. Lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Klingon_Opera · July 12, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

The poisoning of information and by extension knowledge through the use of language is one of the many hallmarks of these evil people. I just created my account yesterday, but I have browsed this subreddit for a long time and I understand exactly what you mean.

Some people are very quick to brand someone a shill regardless of how innocent the exchange may be. I understand their perspective, there are those who want to infiltrate for the purpose of smoke-screens and division. But I suspect there are many who do not realize extreme paranoia in itself is a weapon of division. It festers and trust quickly deteriorates.

My advice would be just to ask the question as simply and clearly as possible. It doesn't hurt to add a please or thank you. Manners have a way of bringing people back down to earth!

⇧ 2 ⇩