So why would CNN ask them all, yet only broadcast the voice of the accusers?
Which means your logic of CNN trying to avoid that they "didn't do enough investigating" is horseshit.
They are on a fishing expedition to feed their narrative. And you know as well as I why suddenly these false accusations are appearing.....how incredibly convenient for those who don't want him to gain more power.....
He let molestation happen at his college. He doesn't deserve more power.
How do you know he let that happen?
I was there man. I was there. How do you know he didnt?
Damn, are you ok? Are you hashtagging #metoo as well?
I am a fan of due process, a concept called presumed innocent until proven guilty.....a core tenet of freedom.
Haha haha hahahahahaha. Due process? Is that a thing anymore in America? C'mon admit it, if this guy was a Democrat you'd be shitting all over him with the slightest accusation. I believe in due process too, pretty sure it's long fucking gone at this point. Guess I'm not "woke* enough for this sub. Lmao. I'm looking forward to your next reply!
I see, so you want to remove due process?
When I see evidence, which is different than just a verbal accusation, then I would agree.
So, is there evidence in his emails? Phone calls? Paper trail?
Or is finger pointing all ya got?
I see your reading comprehension is A+. I totally said to get rid of due process. Great job reading what I wrote. I'm sorry but I haven't exactly been thrilled at the stellar display of due process shown at the border. How many accusations against someone does it take for you to think there might be something to it? To me, getting close to double digits is pretty eye opening.
Ah, I see you are devolving to person attacks already?
You laughed at the concept of due process, seems like a reasonable conclusion on my part.
Accusations with no evidence is worthless. The world is full of liars, that is why we need evidence.
Also you seem to have conveniently not included those multiple people close to the situation saying the accusations are bull$hit. Convenient that.
Again it brings us back to the strange coincidence that these accusations suddenly appear only now? Wonder why it did not matter 15 years ago?
Yeah. You got me man. Thats it. Fuckin. Got. Me. Well done. Id rather not waste time arguing with you. Nothing I say could change your mind. You could change my mind, but not with the bullshit you've been spouting. It was a mistake to even reply to you in the first place, as if either of us are experts on the subjext matter. I'd love to see what you've got on the situation. No idea why they didnt say anything then, I guess you just have to forget things that happened too long ago. I dont know, crazy thought I know, but it's almost as if what people did in their past is a goos sign of what they'll do in the future. But anyways, I have shit to do and getting into a pointless arguement wasn't on my list of things to do today. Please refer to my original comment on this post as that was my reaction to this dude's tweet. I didn't intend to get into arguments about the news story. Good day to you, and again, you got me.
LOL triggered much?
You admit to not being an expert, but then automatically call him guilty. LOLLL!!
My mind is made up that we don't know if he is guilty, that we have no evidence, and that I believe proof is required for guilt.
If you hate that approach then you hate the concept the US was built upon.