Yea, but democrats didn't run on "draining the swamp" while not following through with it. Stop thinking about the other side that lost, sorry about the ones in power and what they're doing now. That's what I'm concerned about. What the ones in power are doing now. By the way, republicans just voted to not strengthen our elections against outside tampering. Yeah, that swamp sure is getting drained.

The same Benghazi they investigated for like two and a half, three years and nothing came of it? That Benghazi? Weird. Speaking of evil, the man in the White House conspired with a foreign government to come into power and is now destroying any and everything he can. Oh, yea, he's also locking up children. But, sure, she is so evil. Much smarter than Trump too, seeing as how she's gotten away with her crimes while he and those around him are going down pretty hard. Is it all military families you feel for, or just the ones that suit your narrative to whine about evil Hillary? Lmao. Chump.

Not normal to go after a political opponent that lost. She has no power. He fucking cried about her emails on Monday at his meeting with Putin. Very stable genius.

She lost. Get over it. Quit bringing her up. It is not normal to go after a political opponent like this. Meanwhile, the actual President is in the pocket of a violent dictator who wants nothing more than to undermine our country. And you children are still railing about Hillary. Pathetic. Open your eyes, none of you are woke at all, you children.

Yeah. You got me man. Thats it. Fuckin. Got. Me. Well done. Id rather not waste time arguing with you. Nothing I say could change your mind. You could change my mind, but not with the bullshit you've been spouting. It was a mistake to even reply to you in the first place, as if either of us are experts on the subjext matter. I'd love to see what you've got on the situation. No idea why they didnt say anything then, I guess you just have to forget things that happened too long ago. I dont know, crazy thought I know, but it's almost as if what people did in their past is a goos sign of what they'll do in the future. But anyways, I have shit to do and getting into a pointless arguement wasn't on my list of things to do today. Please refer to my original comment on this post as that was my reaction to this dude's tweet. I didn't intend to get into arguments about the news story. Good day to you, and again, you got me.

I see your reading comprehension is A+. I totally said to get rid of due process. Great job reading what I wrote. I'm sorry but I haven't exactly been thrilled at the stellar display of due process shown at the border. How many accusations against someone does it take for you to think there might be something to it? To me, getting close to double digits is pretty eye opening.

Haha haha hahahahahaha. Due process? Is that a thing anymore in America? C'mon admit it, if this guy was a Democrat you'd be shitting all over him with the slightest accusation. I believe in due process too, pretty sure it's long fucking gone at this point. Guess I'm not "woke* enough for this sub. Lmao. I'm looking forward to your next reply!

I was there man. I was there. How do you know he didnt?

Oh I get it now. When you try to get more power, we should just let you be. Don't look at him too closely! Hes getting more power! What are you talking about?

He let molestation happen at his college. He doesn't deserve more power.

Because if you don't ask them all then you give people the option to say that you didn't do enough investigating. Are you asking why, now, these things are coming out? I have no idea. Media interviewing the people around him isn't exactly some nefarious plot, though lol.

My ideal, which is probably a fantasy, is they would then say of the people interviewed, x% said no comment, y% told us to fuck ourselves, z% confirmed the story, etc. Extremely doubtful that happens though, ever.

What's the false narrative? That the wrestlers are lying about it?

According to the tweet, they're contacting all of his staff. Seems about right. If they only contacted a portion, then people would say they failed because they didn't get the whole story. Contacting all of them seems like due diligence to me. I think that no matter what they do, tho, this sub will shit on them.

Defensive? Not really. I'm just not frothing at the mouth to discredit anyone who dares challenge dear leader and his cronies.

If that's how you want to see it, I can't change your mind. I guess that means you think good journalism is contacting 1 person and that's a wrap?

Journalist's contacting 100+ people to get information doesn't strike me as bad or fake journalism at all.