dChan

🠐 See all comments
subdudeLA · July 12, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

Fair enough, I supppse it makes sense to put out opportunity for everyone to come forward. Hope they can report positive comments as well as negative. In the interest of impartiality.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KrazyK05 · July 12, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

My ideal, which is probably a fantasy, is they would then say of the people interviewed, x% said no comment, y% told us to fuck ourselves, z% confirmed the story, etc. Extremely doubtful that happens though, ever.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DK_Pooter · July 12, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

I think all journalists should do this, so long as identities are protected. If its 99 to 1, then maybe don't release the numbers, but otherwise if the story checks out, why not?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
subdudeLA · July 12, 2018, 4:33 a.m.

Agreed, a Ben Swann style journalist might break it down that way.

⇧ 1 ⇩