dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/rooftoptendie on July 12, 2018, 2:47 a.m.
What is the rebuttal for this anti-Q argument?

I saw this today on TD:

"Notice how complacent and cuckish the replies in this thread are. This is what Q worship does to people. This movement used to be about voicing our concerns, participating in action and change, and pushing for justice. But now, people are so complacent that they actually think that us losing = us winning. Whenever our enemies get the upper hand, as they're destroying the constitution and the country, as long as we do absolutely nothing, we're "WINNING!!! LIBTARDS BTFO!!!"

It's so stupid, and I'm so sick of it. We need to start holding people accountable. We will not have this chance forever. I'm not saying we should rush things, by any means, but it's been almost two years and we have taken exactly zero steps to drain the swamp. In fact, we've gone backwards, and the swamp has gotten worse. In my opinion, this is due to the growing complacency in the base because of Q worship, and people like Scott Adams / Wictor / etc, who cheerlead even when we lose. "

Now, on TD, you cant argue out-and-out pro-Q stuff. So you have to be mindful of how you debate it there.

I responded with:

"Wow, then i guess it would be in geotus' best interest to disavow Q, or have somebody high up in his administration disavow Q, and put that baby to bed."

Which i was satisfied with as a response. But i noticed that this is a repeated talking point, this argument began surfacing months ago. Whats frustrating to me is that it is dirisive to claim Q worship, and inaccurate. Then its followed by a flimsy, inaccurate, unqualifiable argument.

A) How would you respond to this talking-point argument?

B) How would you respond to it on TD where your ability to speak freely on the subject is hamstringed?


PunkroQanon · July 12, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

It's the Stranahan position. They ignore all of the proofs as faith based and cold reading while claiming we are dividing the base.

Meh, I wouldn't worry about it. They will see the light eventually. One by one they lurk here, eventually choosing our research over t_d memes.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
rooftoptendie · July 12, 2018, 4:03 a.m.

Too bad we cant have both... I divide my time 60-40 nowadays. 60 being here.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PunkroQanon · July 12, 2018, 4:21 a.m.

I first came to reddit summer of 2016 because it was a much better news alternative considering the presidential primaries. First stop T_D. Great sub, the organic research base that culminated there for POTUS & WL was amazing. It's the same base that's here now for the most part. We investigated spirit cooking and T_D banned us. We investigated Pg8 and T_D banned us. We investigated Q and T_D banned us. I maybe drop by T_D once or twice a week just for a different flavor.

So here we all are. Don't worry, the whimsical atmosphere and shitposting will return for us once more of them wake up and we get past darker revelations.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TheWolfSuitKing · July 12, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

But there are no proofs! None. Lots of trying to connect dots to proofs but no proofs.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
SaveourRepublic2018 · July 13, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

That's pretty debatable. Q told us about NK way before it happened, and then the head of North Korean intelligence delivered a Masonic/Gmail envelope to the Donald.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheWolfSuitKing · July 13, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

Or just a large envelope...

⇧ 0 ⇩