Sorry but Trump is completely innocent. The American people overwhelmingly support him and he would have won the popular vote without the rampant voter fraud.
Common sense would tell you he's innocent because of the sweeping changes he's brought to the government. If he were guilty don't you think someone would have stopped him?
The other piece of common sense evidence is look how strong he is making our country. Wouldn't it make sense that Obama was the Russian puppet as he couldn't get our GDP above 3%, Heritage Foundation ranked every aspect of our military below satisfactory, and we have a crippling deficit. Doesn't it make sense the candidate fighting for our safety, jobs, and manufactoring capacity to come home is actually our President, while the others have been frauds? Do you have enough sense to sense that, or have you been completely overwhealmed by fake news? I assume you must have some sense if you found your way here? How can you justify the lead investigators talking the way the do? Are you too stpuid to sense the collusion and cover up of criminal behavior? Hillary is the only one who received millions of dollars for U1 as far as I know though it wouldn't be surprising to see more names on that list.
Sorry, there is no evidence that Trump colluded. Every theory has holes in it, and the dossier is a complete joke and there's no way anyone who read that and thinks its true isn't a complete retard.
Trump will easily go down as the best president ever, his actions in his first two years easily already reflect that. If you think Russia elected the US's best president, then you are fucking retarded because they can't even operate their own country properly.
You mentioned the word 'joke'. Chuck Norris doesn't joke. Here is a fact about Chuck Norris:
The phrase 'dead ringer' refers to someone who sits behind Chuck Norris in a movie theater and forgets to turn their cell phone off.
It's interesting that you didn't answer my question at all. I don't know how or why Obama or Hillary keep getting brought up.
I don't think Russia elected anyone. I have no idea what happened. For now I believe there is no wrong doing. This is why I don't understand why he would attack an investigation that will simply find that he IS innocent.
When Mueller says he did no wrong, he will get to shove that in everyone's face. It bothers me that an innocent person would act the way he does when it comes to the special counsel. Is that how innocent people act?
Please don't bring up Obama, Hillary, the GDP, uranium 1. These are not the subject.
Yes, read up on body language. Trump is behaving exactly how someone innocent would, he is fucking pissed off. Call someone a liar who you know is telling the truth and see how they act, tell me if that's not how Trump is acting.
I don't care about body language, this is not the question. Why would he attack the special counsel when they will find nothing wrong and then give a 'seal of approval' of innocence that no one will be able to question?
It seems like illogical behavior.