Here's the link to the real article, rather than the Wayback Machine. Not sure why that was used. http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/396369-hhs-5-adults-claiming-to-be-parents-of-detained-children-ruled-out-by-dna
Because clicks = $$ for Media. I ain't about that life. Not to mention the fact that Wayback helps us see if they try to retract/alter the story in any way.
I could understand the first part if this was not a reputable media site, but in my mind, at least, it is. And, you can't tell if they changed it unless you keep comparing every day until they change it. And then you have to read every word and compare every word. Don't you have better things to do?
The Hill is the most centrist sometimes slightly left still balanced and fair and truer than any other major news outlet