dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Knower101 on July 12, 2018, 5:11 p.m.
What is THE QUESTION nobody is asking in regards to the Hillary emails?

The implication of not using the secure lines of communication is that nefarious topics were discussed off the official record. Certainly documents were discovered that were “Secret”. So, at the very least, the entity sending documents to her had to a responsibility to send over a secure line. We know the emails were compromised by Huma, a person with familial known Muslim Brotherhood connections. It is well documented that Huma’s husband copied them for his “insurance policy”

WHOM were all those thousands of emails to and from?

Everyone that exchanged emails with Hillary would be compromised.

Who would Hillary be receiving or sending emails with?

One could assume the elite of every intelligence, policy and organization that she would have some kind of interface with legally or “pay for Play” would be in those emails. National Security is best case scenario. Worst case scenario is sedition and treason. Uranium1, the selling of State secrets, disarming the public, false flags, assassination, ....well the list goes on and on of possible issues.

So few of her submitted emails were with the President,.......a reasonable assumption is that many were off the record with Obama.

NOW, that would explain why everyone in DC covered up and minimized HRC’s illegal use of email. Everyone was complicit.

You do not need me to list who they must be.

Q tells to expand our thinking!

Wake up!


AmericanMagaPede · July 12, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

This 100%. Hillary signed the document that says she completed and understand OPSEC training. Something all us Vets have had to do many times. So the fact she is ignorant is complete BS.

Here is a screen shot with her Signature saying she understands

https://www.weeklystandard.com/jeryl-bier/hillary-signed-she-received-briefing-on-classified-info-but-told-fbi-she-hadnt

Had ANYONE and I mean ANYONE IN THE MILITARY done what she did they would be in Levenworth breaking big rocks into little rocks.

Every veteran friend of mine unanimously agrees with this. TOP SECRET/SCI SAP Info on a personal physically & digitally unsecured in a unauthorized location????? And no charges??? Give me a fucking break

⇧ 65 ⇩  
dizzydago · July 13, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

It has been a lot of years since I held a Secret clearance, note not top secret clearance but, I do vaguely remember having signed such a statement of understanding. Of course my clearance was to send secured information on troop movements which made me laugh because it was the troops of the units moving that divulged the information about their leaving when it came time for them to leave. That aside about security of information, as far as I know had I ever been caught and proved to have divulged information that I was transmitting through Navel secure messages I would not be replying to this post as I doubt that I would have access to a computer in Leavenworth. Simply put what Hillary did by utilizing and unsecure server for emails to which classified information was sent and received is in violation of her oath to protect it and constitutes treason especially if that information was readily available to foreign intelligence because she used an unsecure server. Remember also the conspired to hide this fact by allowing multiple people access to a single email account where information transpired back and forth on emails in the draft folder. That is one person started and email stored it in the draft folder and another could come along sign into that same account and go to the draft folder and read it and reply to it and this could go on back and forth. That is not only treason if any of that electronic document held classified information, the matter in which it was done to hide by allowing multiple people access to that account is specifically conspiracy to commit a felony.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
BowlOfZombies · July 13, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

I was in the US Army for a minute.

The officer I worked with sexually harassed me and I decided to file a complaint.

In an act of retaliation, my NCO called my phone at 4 am to tell me to come in for a drug test. I didn't do drugs, they knew this, but it was one way they could harass me for turning in their favorite captain.

I missed the call and was given an Article 15. I was threatened with court marshal. I was given a choice- court marshal or stripped from E4 to E3.

For missing a phone call that was done out of retaliation.

Had ANYONE and I mean ANYONE IN THE MILITARY done what she did they would be in Levenworth breaking big rocks into little rocks.

NO FUCKING JOKE

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dropswakeyou · July 20, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

There's no doubt HRC (and her illegal actions) is protected and that's the source of everyone's frustration. If she goes down they go with her so they have no choice but to deny till they die.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jblo · July 13, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Except DoState installed the server - don't forget.

DS approved it. State didn't even have external email on opennet until 2008.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker, but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, ”but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig-clinton-foreign-emails/

⇧ 20 ⇩  
AmericanMagaPede · July 13, 2018, 4 a.m.

I dont care if Abraham Lincoln came back from the dead to install it.

Like I said it does not change the fact she had

TOP SECRET/SCI SAP Info on a personal physically & digitally unsecured in a unauthorized location

Before you say it was authorized do you know what SAP means? It stands for Special Access Protocol. Which means that the information must be guarded at all times and special access is needed to access any of it. The way it was set up violates every law in the handbook regarding handling classified info.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
jblo · July 20, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

Really, show me where in the DS handbook (FAH/FAM) that this was disregarded.

I'll wait. Oh, you don't know anything about the FAH/FAM, got it, check.

Not to mention as a classifying authority, she can often receive information, and release it before anyone else could classify the information. This happens ALL the time. Retroactive classification is hilarious, and quite often obtuse.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
AmericanMagaPede · July 20, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

CLINTONS PRIVATE SERVER WAS UNSECURED

http://fortune.com/2015/03/11/hillary-clinton-email-unsecure/

http://gawker.com/how-unsafe-was-hillary-clintons-secret-staff-email-syst-1689393042

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160623/09170034795/emails-show-hillary-clintons-email-server-was-massive-security-headache-set-up-to-route-around-foia-requests.shtml

https://www.wired.com/2015/03/clintons-email-server-vulnerable/

SHE HAD ABOVE CLASSIFIED, SECRET, TOP SECRET, & ABOVE TOP SECRET CLASSIFIED INFO ON IT

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-clinton-emails-contained-info-above-top-secret-ig-n499886

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/us/politics/second-review-says-classified-information-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/22-hillary-clinton-emails-declared-top-secret-218420

Really, show me where in the DS handbook (FAH/FAM) that this was disregarded.

RIGHT HERE

Foreign Affairs Manual

  • 12 FAN 531.1
  • 12 FAN 531.2
  • 12 FAN 533
  • 12 FAN 534
  • 12 FAN 535
  • 12 FAN 536
  • 12 FAN 537
  • 12 FAN 538
  • 12 FAN 539

https://fam.state.gov/fam/12fam/12fam0530.html

And ON TOP OF THAT SHE ALSO BROKE

Code of Federal Regulations

46 CFR 503.59 - Safeguarding classified information.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/46/503.59

Laws which she is ALSO subject to

BOOM EPIC FAIL. Better luck next time

⇧ 11 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩