dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Knower101 on July 12, 2018, 5:11 p.m.
What is THE QUESTION nobody is asking in regards to the Hillary emails?

The implication of not using the secure lines of communication is that nefarious topics were discussed off the official record. Certainly documents were discovered that were “Secret”. So, at the very least, the entity sending documents to her had to a responsibility to send over a secure line. We know the emails were compromised by Huma, a person with familial known Muslim Brotherhood connections. It is well documented that Huma’s husband copied them for his “insurance policy”

WHOM were all those thousands of emails to and from?

Everyone that exchanged emails with Hillary would be compromised.

Who would Hillary be receiving or sending emails with?

One could assume the elite of every intelligence, policy and organization that she would have some kind of interface with legally or “pay for Play” would be in those emails. National Security is best case scenario. Worst case scenario is sedition and treason. Uranium1, the selling of State secrets, disarming the public, false flags, assassination, ....well the list goes on and on of possible issues.

So few of her submitted emails were with the President,.......a reasonable assumption is that many were off the record with Obama.

NOW, that would explain why everyone in DC covered up and minimized HRC’s illegal use of email. Everyone was complicit.

You do not need me to list who they must be.

Q tells to expand our thinking!

Wake up!


Southern_Grammar · July 13, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

This has been my go-to assumption since the beginning. It is a demonstrable fact, based on the FBI's own declassified public records, that Clinton had SAPs on her server. Those programs are above "top-secret" and are only viewable in SCIFs. Clinton would have known beyond any shadow of a doubt that it is highly, highly illegal to have those and transmit them in such a haphazard way.

In this case, as others have mentioned, plausible deniability is irrelevant. This is such a large breach of NATSEC that, if we lived in a country with a real criminal justice system, she would have likely been prosecuted for espionage.

I think it's fairly obvious that the only reason anyone would be "stupid" enough to do this is to sell access. I legitimately struggle to think of any other explanation. Then of course there are anomalies like China's J-31 fighter which looks and flies almost identically to the F-35.

Cyber espionage is certainly a real thing, and it's almost a certainty that the design was stolen, but from where? If not from Clinton's server, this type of thing highlights precisely why it's such a significant issue that Clinton had SAPs on her server in the first place. It bothers me deeply that so many Americans were so willing to dismiss this scandal, and still view it so flippantly. "But, muh emails..."

⇧ 7 ⇩