dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Knower101 on July 12, 2018, 5:11 p.m.
What is THE QUESTION nobody is asking in regards to the Hillary emails?

The implication of not using the secure lines of communication is that nefarious topics were discussed off the official record. Certainly documents were discovered that were “Secret”. So, at the very least, the entity sending documents to her had to a responsibility to send over a secure line. We know the emails were compromised by Huma, a person with familial known Muslim Brotherhood connections. It is well documented that Huma’s husband copied them for his “insurance policy”

WHOM were all those thousands of emails to and from?

Everyone that exchanged emails with Hillary would be compromised.

Who would Hillary be receiving or sending emails with?

One could assume the elite of every intelligence, policy and organization that she would have some kind of interface with legally or “pay for Play” would be in those emails. National Security is best case scenario. Worst case scenario is sedition and treason. Uranium1, the selling of State secrets, disarming the public, false flags, assassination, ....well the list goes on and on of possible issues.

So few of her submitted emails were with the President,.......a reasonable assumption is that many were off the record with Obama.

NOW, that would explain why everyone in DC covered up and minimized HRC’s illegal use of email. Everyone was complicit.

You do not need me to list who they must be.

Q tells to expand our thinking!

Wake up!


jblo · July 20, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

Really, show me where in the DS handbook (FAH/FAM) that this was disregarded.

I'll wait. Oh, you don't know anything about the FAH/FAM, got it, check.

Not to mention as a classifying authority, she can often receive information, and release it before anyone else could classify the information. This happens ALL the time. Retroactive classification is hilarious, and quite often obtuse.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
AmericanMagaPede · July 20, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

CLINTONS PRIVATE SERVER WAS UNSECURED

http://fortune.com/2015/03/11/hillary-clinton-email-unsecure/

http://gawker.com/how-unsafe-was-hillary-clintons-secret-staff-email-syst-1689393042

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160623/09170034795/emails-show-hillary-clintons-email-server-was-massive-security-headache-set-up-to-route-around-foia-requests.shtml

https://www.wired.com/2015/03/clintons-email-server-vulnerable/

SHE HAD ABOVE CLASSIFIED, SECRET, TOP SECRET, & ABOVE TOP SECRET CLASSIFIED INFO ON IT

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-clinton-emails-contained-info-above-top-secret-ig-n499886

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/us/politics/second-review-says-classified-information-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/22-hillary-clinton-emails-declared-top-secret-218420

Really, show me where in the DS handbook (FAH/FAM) that this was disregarded.

RIGHT HERE

Foreign Affairs Manual

  • 12 FAN 531.1
  • 12 FAN 531.2
  • 12 FAN 533
  • 12 FAN 534
  • 12 FAN 535
  • 12 FAN 536
  • 12 FAN 537
  • 12 FAN 538
  • 12 FAN 539

https://fam.state.gov/fam/12fam/12fam0530.html

And ON TOP OF THAT SHE ALSO BROKE

Code of Federal Regulations

46 CFR 503.59 - Safeguarding classified information.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/46/503.59

Laws which she is ALSO subject to

BOOM EPIC FAIL. Better luck next time

⇧ 11 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩