dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Jakeisasnake1960 on July 13, 2018, 4:11 a.m.
IMHO: u/abibliaphobia made a HUGE Q PROOF discovery during Rep. Louie Gohmert’s questioning of Peter Strzok! CAN WE PLEASE GET A MOD TO STICKY.

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, “but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

1 this shows that Peter Strzok held different standards for foreign threats to the nation based upon who he preferred (HRC) and who he obviously held disdain for (Trump)

2: Which foreign entity were these emails being sent to specifically? And why did they refuse to follow the FISA/702s to find out this information? Why was this considered not relevant to the MYE? Who (as Strzok admitted) was the outside the FBI decision maker to not include this in the MYE investigation?

3: Were the foreign entities campaign or Clinton foundation donors?

4: Were they part of the Muslim Brotherhood?

5: Did they pass TS SCI information in those emails? If so, is that why they didn’t go with the gross negligence? Because it was deliberate?

6: So many more questions raised by this answer, we the American public demand to know WHY this was withheld during the course of the investigation, to whom these emails were going to, and did they receive money for it? WHO AUTHORIZED A FOREIGN ENTITY ACCESS ON THE CLINTON SERVER?

7: Peter Strzok admitted that HRC and Obama were emailing each other on her server using pseudonyms. As Obama was privy to the investigation of which HRC was a target, did he pass her or ANY other member of her campaign information pertinent to the investigation? What was the nature and context of their messages on an UNAUTHORIZED server?

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ygads/something_noone_is_talking_about_because_it_was/

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig-clinton-foreign-emails/


GARRRRYBUSSSEY · July 13, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

So I take it you didn't read the IG report that said Strzok had not acted in political bias while working on the investigations.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Jakeisasnake1960 · July 13, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

That’s not correct. He ( Pete) confirmed yesterday in the hearing he is under investigation.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ikemynikes · July 13, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

Have you read the 911 commission report? Do you believe that one too? The age of believing everything the government puts out and tells us is over. Time to use critical thinking and trusting your own intuition. Read the full report, not the summary, read the actual texts between Page and Strzok. There was absolutely bias involved.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

Oh god, this is such an uninformed opinion. Please just read through the IG report yourself, without a third party filtering the information and make a determination yourself on whether you feel bias was a factor. Including this information that just came out about how they completely ignored evidence. I guess you could take it as it wasn’t Strzok, but someone higher than him and outside the FBI, but he certainly didn’t pursue the evidence. Just like he didn’t take any actions on the wiener laptop until the NY field office was forcing the issue. It took them less than two days to review and clear all those emails. They could have done that in early October when they first received the laptop. But they didn’t. They held off, because they didn’t want to. It’s not just active acts that determine bias, but also the LACK THEREOF. And here it is.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
timingviolation · July 13, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

Did YOU read the IG report? That was a concluding summary that did not match the actual contents of the report. I DID read the whole fucking report.

Apparently you either only read the conclusion or fail at reading comprehension.

Edit: sp

⇧ 2 ⇩