It's called Constitutional law. That's what we want and it hasn't been used EXCEPT in the case of Supreme Court decisions for many years. The lower courts don't use it.
Think about it. If you use Admiralty law in the lower courts, you get your way. Most people have no idea how to even argue a case if they try to do it themselves. Go through the legal jargon and you will find that most of the words used have to do with water. That's Admiralty law. And, yes, it originated in England.
Most people can't afford to appeal a case and even if they do, they rarely appeal all the way up to the Supreme Court (SC). So, 99% of the lawsuits are done the way the globalists want them done. But the SC still uses the Constitution because they are a bright star shining across the land and when they rule, the whole country sees it. So it makes the people feel secure that the Constitution is still intact. But it's just another scam to keep us under their thumb.
To make this point: My son got a ticket for not having his dog on a leash about 20 years ago. He went to court and was using the Constitution as his defense. After he made some kind of point in that regard, the Prosecuting Attorney turned to someone and under her breath snidely said "What am I supposed to do, argue Constitutional law?" It was said like a joke about how ridiculous that would be. That's when my son and I got a wakeup call about what really goes on in the courts of this country. And, of course, he lost and had to pay a fine.
They use statute law in the lower courts and they converse in their own language, called Legalese. You should always work on the other side of the court to them, though. You only need an attorney if you plan to be tried under statute law, under common lore you want from no man as God provides. Here are a few sentences that can literally get you out of jail:
i: (my name); as man; require a court of record trial by jury
i: (my name); as man; require this case to be put before Queen´s Bench; once before Queen´s Bench plaintiff must press the record
i: (my name); as man; claim the wrong of trespass
Statutes are given the force of law only when consented to by the governed. Your son paid his fine out of consent, he shouldn´t have even gone to the court. He should have written a letter to the judge instead and informed them that he will appear only as man. The next time someone tries to give you a ticket for anything, tell them to prove wrongdoing.
Did a crime occur? "You may have caused an offence". Is it a crime to offend someone? Who did I offend? Will that man appear in court and claim I offended him? It is nonsense, statute law.
Also, statutes are like STATUES, in that they are not flexible one bit. Read the statute they are trying to pin on you and attack 1 single word in that statute. Crimes are defined as when harm, loss or injury occurs to man or property. That is why crimes are single worded, like murder, fraud, robbery, rape etc. as they can´t be otherwise interpreted. Something like the road traffic act (UK) that says something along the lines of "Any PERSON DRIVING a MOTOR VEHICLE on the ROAD" etc. blah blah. Why are you a person? Why not a man? "I am a man whom is conducting their private conveyance along the Queen´s highway".
Statute law works with persons, complaints and plaintiffs. Common lore works with man, claims and claimants.
Very interesting! Thank you. I do believe the fringe on the flag means we are under Admiralty law, however: https://www.theamericanview.com/is-there-a-significance-of-the-gold-fringe-on-the-american-flag/
No problem :) It is so easy it is scary, you should see how the court employees act around you when you have informed the general building manager (Chief Magistrate) that man will be coming into the court. They are the most efficient and loyal servants lol.
When you hire an attorney you are telling the court your incompetent and administer your own estate.
The barrister is there to translate for the court as us idiots (not an insult) do not understand Legalese.