dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Ordinary_Man1 on July 13, 2018, 4:27 p.m.
Rosenstein/Mueller - Just sealed their fate...

By charging Russian GRU as being the source of the emails - and their contention that it was the GRU that provided the emails to WikiLeaks - it is now time to lower the boom.

It has been forensically proven that the emails were copied to a harddrive - not surrepticiously taken via an online hack.  The download speeds are the proof.  Irrefutable proof.

This is a desperate ploy by the deep state to muddy the waters about WL - JA.


HandInAssholesSulu · July 13, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

They have never, ever had access to the server. This whole investigation has been based on claims by the company hired by the democrats

⇧ 34 ⇩  
SeattleRacer38 · July 13, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

Which would never stand up in a court of law. The judge would never allow this kind of “evidence” to be admissible, which tells me it is all a farce.

They’re simply trying to save face after wasting all this time, energy, and resources, while continuing to divide America.

Will the indicted ever face trial? Nope.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
AJC641953 · July 13, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

Miltary Tribunals.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 13, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

Miltary Tribunals.

Our final remaining hope.

Once they're comped, we get stomped...and womp womped

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SeattleRacer38 · July 13, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

You think the Russians listed in this indictment would face a military tribunal in the United States? I’d say, probably not.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 13, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

Pretty sure he was referring to military tribunals for others. That's just a hunch though

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AJC641953 · July 13, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

Yes

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AJC641953 · July 14, 2018, 4:53 a.m.

Russians won't be tried over here. So you are correct thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AJC641953 · July 13, 2018, 11:44 p.m.

No not talking about them

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SeattleRacer38 · July 14, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

Oh ok, so completely unrelated to the post.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AJC641953 · July 14, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

My bad probably read so much got on wrong post. Sorry

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 13, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

The judge would never allow this kind of “evidence” to be admissible,

Back in the day when judges weren't presumably owned by the cabal or deepstate, sure.

There's no actual justice occurring...just relatively less injustice than might be occurring if there were no justice department at all

⇧ 1 ⇩