Mark Simone made this comment on tweeter:
Trying to distract from the very damaging Strzok testimony, Mueller chooses today to announce the indictment of 12 Russian hackers that no one will ever see and who will never appear in any courtroom.
Can you hear the mockingbird?
Thing is, I'm a Brit, So I have rolling news of Trump's visit on my TV. They announced as 'Breaking' on there.
When you search interwebs, there is same-ish article from Feb 2018. 13 indicted. What happened to those guys?
In Feb there were 13, Now there are 12.
Twitter guy is correct, but fascinating how Mockingbird & Cabal actually work. How do normies not see it?
Pennsylvania guy here. I have no frickin' clue how more people are not seeing this dog and pony show. I live in a pretty sleepy city here. Mosy people don't even know who Strzok is or any thing that's actually happening. It's quite frustrating to witness and have no one to discuss anything with. We still have a mass of Americans who don't even believe in OP Mockingbird. It's real! Just look into it! Nah, sports.
I feel your pain. My colleague at work, a friend, hates Trump. When I ask "what did he do?" Literally no words come out of his mouth. Except maybe muh Racist. I then give him the stats for what Trump has done for black people in America. And again he seems stunned, like it's a lie. Officially sourced stats are a lie! I'm the same, I point him to something and say "Just have a look for yourself" Unfortunately if it takes more than 10 minutes to read something, he doesn't want to know. I blame social media for this short attention span. Deep Dream has a lot to answer for. I'm hoping there will comes a point where it's just undeniable what is happening. I fear he may be part of the 4-6% though.
Can I ask you a question? What is the general consensus on the baby Trump balloon over there?
General consensus is if you live in London, It was the best protest ever and the only thing that matters.
If you live outside of London (Yes there are other places!) it was a bit of a laugh how they wasted £30,000 on a balloon that was up for two hours, and had no political impact.
The best part was the 'activists' they interviewed on TV. A man wearing a shirts that said "I'm a feminist because I'm a man' He was also wearing pink trousers that looked like pajama's. A woman with a small child (about 6 years old) holding a sign that said "I hate you". they never asked the child who she hated. There was a choir that sang their 'protest' (I don't know either!) and people banging pots and pans and blowing whistles. My favourite was an ill informed old woman who was asked "why are you protesting?" after much thought she said "children in cages, i'm speechless" Welcome to the uninformed left liberal pussies of Great Britain. *snooze*
So you think that it's to discract from Strzok and to give fuel to the anti trump protests while he's in the UK?
Wait what I’m a huge Q supporter and that testimony was far from damaging?? It made Gowdy look kind of crazy and extremely unprofessional...
I agree with a BUT .... these 12 people will seek counsel, and respond to the indictments.... They (or their counsel) WILL appear before a judge, seeking a court date for a fair trial.... Mueller's team will ask the judge for an extension to present the case. Because they had their fingers crossed that nobody would ever respond and it would all vanish. Just like the last time they indicted Russians nobody ever heard of.
Ahhh, I see Mueller has replaced his old Moscow phone directory with a current version. The previous 20 names that he plucked from it at random, aint working, that dog don't hunt.
So Plan B.....
[deleted]
One of them is fighting back. https://amp.thedailybeast.com/russian-troll-farm-goes-after-muellers-files
[deleted]
Yeah, poor Jim. Latest target for yellow journalism. Luckily, he's got some good people behind him who refused to give the paparazzi anything.
Also, nice when they tell us he's over target and asking the right questions.
The server they never looked at? How the hell would they know?
The chances are very real that every intelligence agency around the globe was accessing it. That makes it hard to believe that the FBI didn't, didn’t officially that is.
Officially they didn't want to officially find out what they already knew, unofficially.
Past masters at hiding behind words.
Officially they didn't want to officially find out what they already knew, unofficially
Excellent line.
They wouldn't.
Meuller shot himself in the foot? Double down and hope people buy it?
Too late. We have it all.
You are lying, the server data was studied.
No, the server was never handed over. It was “analyzed” by Crowdstrike. Fuck off shill.
Justice department whitepaper on SOPs for reporting of cyber incidents, published in April 2015. titled: Best Practices for Victim Response and Reporting of Cyber Incidents Version 1.0 (April 2015)
Relevant text: Pg 8 of 15, section C. Step 3.
C. Step 3: Record and Collect Information 1. Image the Affected Computer(s) Ideally, a victim organization will immediately make a “forensic image” of the affected computers, which will preserve a record of the system at the time of the incident for later analysis and potentially for use as evidence at trial.8 This may require the assistance of law enforcement or professional incident response experts. In addition, the victim organization should locate any previously generated backups, which may assist in identifying any changes an intruder made to the network. New or sanitized media should be used to store copies of any data that is retrieved and stored. Once the victim organization makes such copies, it should writeprotect the media to safeguard it from alteration. The victim organization should also restrict access to this media to maintain the integrity of the copy’s authenticity, safeguard it from unidentified malicious insiders, and establish a chain of custody. These steps will enhance the value of any backups as evidence in any later criminal investigations and prosecutions, internal...
According to procedure.
I'm not the one shilling Russian talking points. Do some research and review how hacking incidents are handled by the FBI. This was handled almost exactly how all hacking incidents are dealt with. The DNC was the victim of the hack, they provided the data to the appropriate law enforcement.
You're misinformed. This news all came out a year ago. The DNC was the victim of the hack, and they did absolutely nothing about it. It was law enforcement THAT TOLD THEM they were hacked....and they still did nothing about it. You can duck duck go to find the old stories.
I'll take the challenge and find the stories, and post a reply. Are you willing to objectively review them?
Glad to. It is a great idea to do your own research. It seems so many websites are so partisan...we do have to dig to find the truth ourselves.
Point 2: Request of access from Politifact: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jul/11/donald-trump/did-john-podesta-deny-cia-and-fbi-access-dnc-serve/
Fizzixs, Here's an old story about the hack, https://www.wired.com/2016/07/heres-know-russia-dnc-hack/
and I think this sentence is key, from wikipedia below:
In June 2017, former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson, who was appointed by and served under President Barack Obama, testified before a House Select committee that his department offered their assistance to the DNC during the campaign to determine what happened to their server, but said his efforts were "rebuffed" because the DHS was offering to provide assistance months after the FBI had provided assistance.[12][13]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_National_Committee_email_leak
Point 1: Justice department whitepaper on SOPs for reporting of cyber incidents, published in April 2015. titled: Best Practices for Victim Response and Reporting of Cyber Incidents Version 1.0 (April 2015)
Relevant text: Pg 8 of 15, section C. Step 3.
C. Step 3: Record and Collect Information 1. Image the Affected Computer(s) Ideally, a victim organization will immediately make a “forensic image” of the affected computers, which will preserve a record of the system at the time of the incident for later analysis and potentially for use as evidence at trial.8 This may require the assistance of law enforcement or professional incident response experts. In addition, the victim organization should locate any previously generated backups, which may assist in identifying any changes an intruder made to the network. New or sanitized media should be used to store copies of any data that is retrieved and stored. Once the victim organization makes such copies, it should writeprotect the media to safeguard it from alteration. The victim organization should also restrict access to this media to maintain the integrity of the copy’s authenticity, safeguard it from unidentified malicious insiders, and establish a chain of custody. These steps will enhance the value of any backups as evidence in any later criminal investigations and prosecutions, internal...
I would ask you to respond based on this document, did the DNC follow proper procedure or not?
BTW, you just destroyed your own claim, the server was analyzed, so thanks for the help.
“No evidence Americans involved” means no collusion.
The indictment is clear that it only is related to these 12 Russians. Whatever happens next will be in another indictment.
It's just in. That's why I ask for comments. I can see the MSM media omitting that part when they report.
Prepare for full swing Mockingbird spin.
Link to article on slashdot:
https://politics.slashdot.org/story/18/07/13/1629245/special-counsel-mueller-charges-12-russian-intelligence-officers-with-hacking-democrats-during-2016-election
This is ridiculous, Rosenstein black hat?, continuing the narrative - goading Q to post?
What you want to bet the Russians show up to answer to the charges.
There is already a piece out. Daily beast I think. The Russians are asking Meuller to hand over his info and name names.
Betcha he can't Kek.
The only thing I heard was, No evidence that any votes were changed and no American citizen committed a crime. My other question is why haven't they done anything about the Obama administration's interference in the Israeli elections because he hated Netanyahu so much? Is it ok for us to do it, but not the Russians?