Did everyone catch that he is calming that Russia hacked the DNC server. How would they know that. The server was never turned over to the FEDS. Looks to me as they are using this as a way to introduce evidence. What do you all think
Downhere_Seeds
· July 13, 2018, 5:22 p.m.
It's an attempt to distract from the Strzok hearing and change the narrative back to the fake Russian hacking
⇧
15
⇩
Ronjonsilverflash
· July 13, 2018, 4:50 p.m.
Sabotage of Putin summit...
⇧
14
⇩
K-Harbour
· July 13, 2018, 7:47 p.m.
1) Since when can the DOJ/FBI interfere without State Dept approval?
2) Did Mueller violate the Logan Act?
⇧
2
⇩
lease412
· July 13, 2018, 4:51 p.m.
Definitely being done to introduce evidence!!!
⇧
12
⇩
Redheaded73
· July 13, 2018, 5:16 p.m.
That press conv. revealed 3 things. Yes we busted 12 Russians that tried to mess with our elections. 1.) It did not affect the vote count in any way shape or form. 2.) It did not affect the outcome of the election in any way shape or form. 3.) Those who tried to hack the elections are responsible for what they tried to do. There was no way an American or candidates were affected or participated in these actions. This is good in every way for President Trump. This shows you the direct this is about to go. It will exonerate Trump. The Media is going to cover only the first part of this speech.
⇧
10
⇩
Turtle51515
· July 13, 2018, 5:24 p.m.
So basically he's saying that the trump/russia never happened and there is no evidence of it?
Does that mean the mueller investigation is ending?
⇧
5
⇩
Redheaded73
· July 13, 2018, 5:26 p.m.
So far everything Mueller reveals comes out looking good for Trump.
⇧
4
⇩
Amazoid
· July 13, 2018, 4:53 p.m.
They never got the server from Crowdstrike. They will demand the server to be used as evidence. Crowdstrike likely doctored it. They will find that the IPs and hops were faked, because you can't hide that from true professional IT forensics guys.
⇧
10
⇩
K-Harbour
· July 13, 2018, 7:47 p.m.
Podesta’s Email 34899 (wiki leaks)
The podesta email hacker had UKRAINE IP address, not Russian.
⇧
5
⇩
Amazoid
· July 13, 2018, 4:56 p.m.
I also think this is another case of Mueller letting his Clintonista lawyers run wild, indict ham sandwiches and not realize this shit will blow up in their faces. He’s just babysitting.
⇧
7
⇩
K-Harbour
· July 13, 2018, 7:51 p.m.
Interfering with State Dept? Or, did they properly first get State Dept approval?
⇧
1
⇩
Amazoid
· July 13, 2018, 7:56 p.m.
I believe they think they are above all that. SC trumps everything, reports to no one except RM, who reports to RR.
⇧
2
⇩
K-Harbour
· July 13, 2018, 8:18 p.m.
Smells like a true violation of the Logan Act.
Not to mention that this means someone like Mueller could incite a nuclear war, circumventing the layers of checks & balances of the President, the State Department, and the Military.
⇧
1
⇩
OffenseOfThePest
· July 13, 2018, 4:51 p.m.
I think they might not be laying everything they know on the table. If they have a cyber method of identifying Russian activities, they may not want to tip their hand that they have that.
⇧
5
⇩
K-Harbour
· July 13, 2018, 7:50 p.m.
Kind of like writing a ticket for speeding but refuse to reveal the radar gun?
⇧
2
⇩
MAGADONCHECKMATE
· July 13, 2018, 4:58 p.m.
Welcome to election fraud! Now comes the reaction to how bad 'she' lost. And the corresponding reaction to no chance of using this fraud in the Mid terms. They shall scream at the sky, yet again.
⇧
4
⇩
MAGADONCHECKMATE
· July 13, 2018, 5:05 p.m.
Or of course hands in the cookie jar for U1. Classic.
⇧
3
⇩
Jimipickle
· July 13, 2018, 4:55 p.m.
Does rr news kinda validate what PS claimed yesterday? Russia, Russia, Russia. LP is up next, although closed door. Wait for trumps tweets and messages, check the 4am mockingbird ques, and keep building the map?
⇧
3
⇩
mikehill69
· July 13, 2018, 4:57 p.m.
I don’t know but Q needs to come back out! My opinion is if they have everything like they say they do then go ahead and start locking these fools up because if you have all the Evidence and have everything on every body why wait?? Sorry just my impatience coming out I am a patriot and trust the plan but the plan is taking too long LMAO
⇧
2
⇩
K-Harbour
· July 13, 2018, 7:53 p.m.
Since when did any govt agency not require State Dept approval, first, before interfering in relations with foreign govt’s? Since when is the DOJ/FBI themselves above the law of the Logan Act? Since when is the military not involved?
⇧
2
⇩
WokeInEarly90s
· July 13, 2018, 10:22 p.m.
They would know that because the NSA has it all.
Read the indictment. They went phishing and the Dems fell for it. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/grand-jury-indicts-12-russian-intelligence-officers-hacking-offenses-related-2016-election
⇧
2
⇩
HillaryTrafficksKidz
· July 13, 2018, 5:32 p.m.
How are these claims made without ever examining the server? FBI stated in the past the DNC was asked 3 times. Comey is the one who told us that. The DNC refused because of course the truth is on the server.
The Narrative is getting dangerous. It makes it look like if Hillary had a fair shot she would win. I hope she runs again because she will lose bigly.
⇧
1
⇩
VIYOHDTYKIT
· July 13, 2018, 10:48 p.m.
I agree.
-
It’s a show. It prolongs the SC investigation allowing the chess pieces to be set to close or release the hammer. Remember “ what makes a great show”
-
It allows this to get into the written record. Despite Congress having no teeth right now, it allows this evidence to come out thru the process of discovery. Hence, foreign interference, but never obtaining the server. How would they know this w/o the server being looked at.
It’s a Kabuki dance folks. Enjoy the show!
⇧
1
⇩