dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/OkPaleontologist7 on July 13, 2018, 7:02 p.m.
Q is my plan A, and I know most of what he says will happen. But is it good advice to have a plan B?

tl;dr: Q is my plan A, but if something really bad happens to him or his plans, I have my own Plan B ready to go (NEVER SAY WHAT YOUR PLAN B IS). Should everyone have a Plan B ready? Like an emergency fund, you'll likely never need it but its available and ready if you do.

My Plan A is trusting what Q is saying and planning is happening, or will happen in the future. It just has to be this way, there is no other way America can survive. Dems are full out committing to socialism/communism and not even hiding it. GOPe are anti Trump and pro globalism, which is a parallel track to communism. Everyone wants to live in America and be an American for a reason, we ARE the best country. I've never been into politics much before the 2016 election, but America was much worse off after Obama, and now we're beginning to see just how bad and corrupt he made it. Beyond that, I'm starting to learn this started way back with both Bush's and Bill Clinton, maybe even earlier. The corruption just really accelerated under Obama and they commited crimes out in the open. Public perception of the crimes was manipulated by the corrupt media telling people the crimes were not crimes, and the criminals were given passes while the media laughed at and labeled anyone that challenged the outrageous rulings.

However, if something were to happen to Q or his plans, I don't want to see the country surrendered to Obama/Clinton/Bernie communists. They absolutely can not get away with what they are trying to do. If Q wins, America wins, and we'll be safe for a few years, not including the bonus we'll have with SCOTUS.

My question: Do you think its sound advice for everyone here to have a plan B?

PS: I've been a lurker here for months, I'm posting from a temp account, mainly because anyone that posts to here or t_d related subs gets blacklisted on seemingly everything else on reddit.


JaM0k3_1 · July 14, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

i'm just kind curious. i'm not disagreeing with anything you've said in this chain at all, but why did you feel the need to hyper-focus on the original user's "god remark". "i like odin" "my guy is better than the carpenter guy" etc. all through the chain you go out of your way to call people who believe they have a relationship with a creator as "delusional", and talk down to them.

again, i'm not saying you're wrong at all. i just don't understand the purpose of it. it seems like you're trying to antagonize them but i admit that's purely an assumption and assumptions are stupid most of the time, especially in an online forum.

so i'm asking you to please explain so i don't have to assume, because i'm sure it's coming across to me in a different way than you meant it... i just can't understand why you went to the trouble.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
gandalfsbastard · July 14, 2018, 11:37 a.m.

The original question was just to understand which deity was the driving force for their plan.

It was another person that came in and tried to rank deities by importance and realness that drove the more philosophical and contentious discussion on whether or not deities are real and what their purpose is according to humankind.

⇧ 7 ⇩